Treason Abounds ~ Gov't Cabal Plots North American Union (NAU)
By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D.
September 4, 2006
Updated January 1, 2008
This research will reveal the betrayal of the American people by a government cabal who are bent on destroying our sovereignty in order to create a North American Union. The miscreants include many who function at the highest levels in our government. Many hold membership in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission and pursue a subversive agenda. The cabal is deliberately circumventing the U.S. Congress and 'We the People' in blatant violation of our Constitution. Collectively they are committing TREASON. If you continue to believe that the illegal alien invasion is the biggest threat to America, you will never understand that there is something far more dangerous to our country called the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" (SPP). As bad as the illegal alien situation is . . . you will learn that this nation is in dire peril far exceeding the illegal alien problem.
Educate yourself. Follow the links in the references provided below. Read what your own government has posted on their official websites such as the Whitehouse.gov, SPP.gov, State.gov and http://(no space)Canada.USembassy.gov. You will be aghast at the nearly complete destruction of our sovereignty, Bill of Rights, Constitution, laws, Republic, and freedoms they have ALREADY achieved. This heinous ongoing treason has been engineered by an entrenched cabal of legislators, courts, military brass, and government employees in this and prior administrations. The tyranny is being facilitated by hundreds of people embedded at all levels of the executive branch constituting a so called 'Shadow Government' who are working in concert to dismantle this country in plain sight. The agenda was engineered by the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR) and kept secret by their deliberately mute media collaborators.
Will your children live under THIS NAFTA Flag instead of 'Old Glory'?
Those treasonous 'media collaborators' have consistently used the most effective tool in controlling what the media reports, which is the tool of 'OMISSION' . . . think [illegal] immigrant and [Communist] China for example.
As For Why Most Americans are Unaware of the CFR Organization . . .
David Rockefeller, chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) for 15 years (1970-1985), also founded and is the honorary chairman of the Trilateral Commission. His father John D. and brother Nelson purchased and then donated the land beneath the UN for $8.5 million dollars, then claimed it as a charitable deduction.(1)
As for how the machinations of the CFR have remained unnoticed . . . in 1991 in Baden-Baden, Germany, David Rockefeller gloatingly said: "We're grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government."(2)
In other words, Americans are to be treated like mushrooms, kept in the dark and fed plenty of you know what!
CFR member Richard N. Gardner, who in a 1974 Foreign Affairs article titled: "The Hard Road to World Order" wrote: In short, the "house of world order" will have to be built from the bottom up rather than the top down. It will look like a great "booming, buzzing confusion" [like the chaos of an overwhelming illegal alien invasion combined with the uncertainty of 'the war on terror' which will provide cover for] . . . an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, [which] will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.(3)
David Rockefeller (4)
And what does David Rockefeller say about his work?
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interest of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists ' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."(5)
What colossal arrogance! Like other globalists, he loses sight of man's humanity and the very fundamental nature of what it is to BE human. Mankind will ALWAYS resist subjugation and will ALWAYS struggle to have and maintain their freedoms . . . after all . . . for us Americans . . . it is the very essence of what it is to BE an American.
Here's Rockefeller's 1973 View on Communist China . . .
"The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose . . . The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history."
The Cultural Revolution claimed the lives of nearly 100 million people in order to achieve the 'success' that David Rockefeller admires. One might question just how he can reconcile those deaths and consider it something of value and worthy of praise instead of being condemned for its abject horror and inhumanity. Perhaps Mr. Rockefeller needs a little 're-education.'
How Did the CFR Get Embedded in Our Government?
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was incorporated in New York on July 29, 1921, as the American branch of the Institute of International Affairs while the British branch was called the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA). The original membership included Colonel House, J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Otto Kahn, and Jacob Schiff who had previously engineered the creation of the Federal Reserve System.
The RIAA leadership was comprised of members of the Round Table which was started by Cecil Rhodes in the 1800's which was designed to "federate the English speaking peoples of the world, and bring it under their rule".
According to Barry Goldwater, in his book With No Apologies . . . "In September 1939, two members of the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] visited the State Department to offer the council's services."(6)
"They proposed to do research and make recommendations for the department without formal assignment or responsibility, particularly in four areas - security armaments, economic and financial problems, political problems, and territorial problems. The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to finance the operation of this plan."(6)
"From that day forward, the Council on Foreign Relations has placed its members in policy-making positions with the State Department and other federal agencies. Every Secretary of State since 1944, with the exception of James F. Byrnes, has been a member of the [CFR] council."(6) The trend continues on as both Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell are members of the CFR.
Others Who have Spoken Out About the 'Shadow Government':
"Rear Admiral Chester Ward, USN (Retd.), who was a member of the CFR for sixteen years, has written, 'The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common--They want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States."(6)
"Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962) said: The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes."(7)
"In a letter to an associate dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote, The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."(7)
In a speech given on February 23, 1954, Senator William Jenner warned America: "Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded."(7)
In fact, the Constitution is far more than 'outmoded,' according to President Bush who rebuffed GOP leader's request to soft pedal some parts of the 'Patriot Act' by saying: "I don't give a goddamn . . . I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way." Then, responding to an aide who stated: "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution." Bush screamed back: "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face . . . It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"(8)
As for the 'bureaucratic elite' of wealthy globalists who function as the 'Shadow Government' . . . their ultimate goal is a so called NEW World Order, which is course is NOT NEW but is, in reality, a ONE World Order. To that end, Franklin Delano Roosevelt managed to condemn their monopolist lust from the grave in a message found enshrined on this FDR memorial:
THEY (WHO) SEEK TO ESTABLISH
SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT BASED ON
THE REGIMENTATION OF ALL HUMAN
BEINGS BY A HANDFUL OF INDIVIDUAL
RULERS CALL THIS A NEW [WORLD] ORDER
IT IS NOT NEW AND IT IS NOT ORDER
And What Does a World Controlled by the United Nations Look Like?
Written in 1962 and prepared by the Institute for Defense Analyses submitted to the Department of State: "A world effectively controlled by the United Nations is one in which "world government" [One World Government (OWO)]would come about through the establishment of supranational institutions [such as the UN], characterized by mandatory universal membership and some ability to employ physical force. Effective control would thus entail a preponderance of political power in the hands of a supranational organization [i.e. the United Nations] rather than in individual national units [like the United States], and would assume the effective operation of a general disarmament agreement. While this supranational organization -- the United Nations -- would not necessarily be the organization as it now exists, the present UN Charter could theoretically be revised in order to erect such an organization equal to the task envisaged, thereby codifying a radical rearrangement of power in the world."(9)
Are we there yet? Think UNESCO, LOST, Earth Charter, Agenda 21, Areas Foundations, CANAMEX, 'Global Warming' and the Kyoto Treaty, the World Court, The Hague, WTO, GATT, NASCO, NAFTA, CAFTA and all the rest of the alphabet entities granted external control over the sovereign nation of the United States of America.
Coming up . . . the FTAA (Free Trade Areas of the Americas), the final nail in America's coffin. The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) is an attempt to expand the failed North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to every country in Central America, South America and the Caribbean, except Cuba. Negotiations began right after the completion of NAFTA in 1994 and were supposed to have been completed by January 1, 2005. Sovereignty? For how much longer?
The Goal of the Globalists Is To Gain World Monopoly
According to "Antony Sutton, a research fellow for the Hoover Institution for War, Revolution, and Peace at Stanford University . . . 'While monopoly control of industries was one the objectives of J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to 'go political' and make society go to work for the monopolists-- under the name of the public good and the public interest'."(7)
"Frederick C. Howe revealed the strategy of using government in a 1906 book, Confessions of a Monopolist: These are the rules of big business . . . Get a monopoly; let society work for you; and remember that the best of all business is politics . . . "(7)
To fully understand the truly 'dark side' of a monopoly, how about using "food as a weapon" as was once declared by Henry Kissinger. It is strongly suggested that you read this article on the future of genetically (read patentable and monopolized) engineered seeds. All food starts with seeds and there is now a patent by Delta & Pine Land, which is about to be acquired by Monsanto, because they engineered a 'Terminator' seed which cannot be used for the next year's crop because it automatically self-destructs at the end of the growing season. How sick is that?
Follow the twisted devious financial and political connections to its conclusion where in the final three paragraphs you will find that: "The key scientific member of the Delta & Pine Land board since 1993 has been Dr. Nam-Hai Chua. Chua, 62, is also head of the Rockefeller University Plant Molecular Biology Laboratory in New York, and has been for over 25 years, the labs which are at the heart of the Rockefeller Foundation's decades-long development, and spending of more than $100 millions of its own research grants to create their Gene Revolution. Until 1995, Chua was also a scientific consultant to Monsanto Corporation, as well as to DuPont's Pioneer Hi-Bred International. Chua is at the heart of Rockefeller's Gene Revolution. And, clearly, Delta & Pine Land and their research on Terminator have been in the center of that work."(10)
A De Facto Global Economy!
If you think about it, by sending our manufacturing base to Mexico or other foreign countries, the globalists have FORCED America to become global when in the past we were self-contained and produced all we needed for ourselves and exported our excess around the world. Now we are dependent on countries like China, etc., to supply stores like Wal-mart with nearly all of its merchandise. Say what you want about Wal-mart, but their inventory includes nearly everything a person might need at a price working Americans can afford to pay, since wages have not kept pace with inflation.
In fact . . . later in this research, you will find that the cabal working toward the NAU has gone one step further and created non-profit foundations to develop many of the road and infrastructure projects that are planned under NAFTA 'plus' called the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). This means that NO TAXES will enter the coffers of America's government till. Even worse . . . you will find that they are using all manner of federal tax dollars to fund some of the 'non-profit' projects that are already in place. Clever by half, wouldn't you say. Take taxpayer dollars, make money and pay no taxes in return while America, by default, becomes the North American Union.
The 'Shadow Government has begun their 'race to the finish' and have become ever more arrogant and bold. They have concluded that they are so close to complete conquest that they are ever more blatantly flouting our Constitution and laws than you can ever imagine in your wildest of dreams of hell on earth.
What IS Happening to America? Have You Ever Pondered The Following . . .
Didn't you ever wonder why our borders are still wide open?
Didn't you ever wonder why our immigration laws are unenforced?
Didn't you ever wonder why CAFTA was passed in the House by two recanted votes after the time for voting had expired? Especially in light of the fact that most ordinary people would agree that NAFTA has been such a devastating failure for both Mexico and America.
Didn't you ever wonder why the Senate told 83% of 'We the People' to 'go to hell' when they passed the amnesty bill S. 2611 which will add 100 million people to America in the next ten years according to Dr. Robert Rector of the Heritage Institute. That number is a CONSERVATIVE estimate since statisticians extrapolated those numbers from the 2000 census to arrive at the totally bogus figures of 10-12 million illegals.
Didn't you ever wonder why the reconquista rabble can march in our streets and shout from the roof tops that they want to take over the Southwest and our government doesn't investigate them for sedition like they did the VA nurse who wrote a letter to the editor complaining about the Iraq War, and the government's handling of Hurricane Katrina.(11)
What is sedition? Webster's defines it as follows: "The stirring up of discontent, resistance, or rebellion against the government in power." These photos speak directly to the issue of sedition in the streets of America:
Go here and view the reconquista rabble in the streets and listen to their anti-American rants of sedition, which unlike the VA nurse, remain unchallenged to this day: Mob politics. (12)
Here's more sedition by a charter school principal and the mayor of Los Angeles titled: The Aztec Al-Qaeda. (13)
In "1968---The Hispanic organization, the Southwest Council of LaRaza Unida, is created with a $630,000 grant from the Ford Foundation, which supports the movement to bring massive numbers of Mexicans into the U.S. From 1968 to 1992, Ford Foundation grants to radical Hispanics totaled over $31 million. And according to Henry Santiestevan (former head of the Southwest Council of LaRaza), It would hardly be an exaggeration to say that the Ford Foundation is the Chicano movement."(14)
Included in the list of well financed 'radical Hispanic' groups are the National Council of La Raza (i.e., The Race), MALDEF and LULAC. One other caveat is that the US Attorney General Gonzales is rumored to be a card carrying member of NCLR, a charge that he has never denied. What better way to achieve the goal of a North American Union than to arm a '5th column' of rabid racist Hispanics organizations that will support massive illegal immigration creating a de facto elimination of our borders as the CFR desires. Some wags have even said that the CFR initials probably stand for Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller.(15)(16)
Along with the non-profit foundations that are funding the racist reconquista rabble, there has been a concerted effort by our own government to aid and abet the massive illegal alien anarchy you see in our streets. Below in the numbered references you can find three well researched articles by this author that document how our government and the non-profit foundations are promoting, aiding and abetting the illegal alien anarchy: (17)(18)(19)
Then There Are Those Americans Who Are NOT Funded by the Non-Profits:
For example, the VA nurse mentioned above or one George Barisich who lost everything in Katrina, his business, his home . . . while at the same time his extended family "lost 14 of their 17 houses in St. Bernard," Louisiana. Barisich was ticketed after six DHS security officers surrounded him in his vehicle on a Wal-Mart parking lot for giving away a T-shirt which said: "Flooded by Katrina! Forgotten by FEMA! What's Next, Mr. Bush?" The parking lot was considered 'federal property' because there was a FEMA center located elsewhere on it. Barisich was there picking up canned goods from a charity relief tent.(20)
Or . . . Jan Hall an Orange County Florida, Sadler Elementary School teacher who wrote a letter to her congressman that was confiscated by someone who translated it and had it published in the Spanish language newspaper El Nuevo Dia to incite hate and anger against her. You can find the original handwritten letter here: (21) As a result, Jan Hall was immediately suspended without pay, and threatened with loss of her teaching license after 33 years of teaching.
All this was done before a thorough investigation and in violation of her civil rights. Ms. Hall is now pursuing a $20 million dollar lawsuit against the school and its administration stating: " . . . you nevertheless, chose to use her exercise of these clearly protected Constitutional rights as grounds to suspend her without pay, to publicly disparage and humiliate her, to demonize her in the Greater Orlando community . . ."(22)
Unfortunately today, it takes a law suit to preserve your constitutional rights.
Then There is the 'Back Door' Approach to Eliminating America's Sovereignty . . .
By auctioning off America to the highest bidder, no questions asked as . . . "According to the Secretary of the Department of Transportation, Norman Mineta, 'We are like a poker game. We are inviting people to the table and saying, bring money when you come'."(23)
Didn't you ever wonder who CFIUS was when you heard they approved the Dubai Ports deal?
Its full name is the 'Committee on Foreign Investment in the US' which falls under the aegis of the U.S. Treasury Department. CFIUS was established in 1975 by Gerald Ford's Executive Order 11858. An Executive Order is legislation by Presidential fiat! Then in 1988 Ronald Reagan delegated his oversight to CFIUS by Executive Order 12661. This order required CFIUS "to submit a report and recommendation to the President at the conclusion of an investigation."(24)
© Marta Lavandier (AP)
If you will recall, it was CFIUS that insanely approved the United Arab Emirates, Dubai Ports World (DPW) takeover of 6 of our major seaports. Remember . . . it was a 'done deal' by time the sale became public. The committee works in SECRET and makes SECRET decisions. CFIUS has reviewed 1500 cases and blocked only ONE! The Dubai deal was approved even after several federal agencies objected to it on security grounds. Only when there was public outcry did the deal come under scrutiny.(25)
What was interesting was that George Bush professed 'no knowledge' of the deal even though CFIUS is required to submit "a report and recommendation to the President at the conclusion of an investigation." "The Committee has 30 days to decide whether to investigate a case and an additional 45 days to make its recommendation. Once the recommendation is made, the President has 15 days to act," if necessary to block the deal.(26)(25)
Was Bush lying about his knowledge concerning such a massive transaction with obvious major security implications or was it simple incompetence? He should have known if CFIUS was abiding by the rules. Compounding the felony, President Bush "threatened to veto any attempt by Congress to kill the port deal."(27)
Many Americans understood that: "The [DPW] deal is yet another plot, approved in secret, which would undermine American national security and sovereignty for the benefit of the transnational political and commercial plutocrats who manage government and business across the globe."(28)
The Gov't Provides Bogus Propaganda AFTER the Dubai Deal Comes Under Fire
Read about the Dubai Ports World deal that the Treasury Department and DHS (Dept. of Homeland Security) dutifully spewed forth in defense of the CFIUS approval. Be sure to wear you 'hip boots' when you wade into these three propaganda 'reports.'(29)(30)(31)
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) threw in its two-cents worth of propaganda during the Senate debate on the U.S.-Oman free trade agreement with a fatuous non sequitur which stated: "Congress may not appreciate what is at stake. Far from being in continuous conflict, open capital markets and national security support one another. A strong economy is part of national security . . . "(32)
Isn't that backwards? Shouldn't the WSJ have said that a strong national security provides 'support' for the economy? Isn't it paramount that security NOT be a part of the economic engine so that the 'almighty dollar' couldn't trump security measures? Isn't that common sense? After all the Wall Street Journal is prima facie evidence of those who would prostitute themselves in pursuit of that same 'almighty dollar.'
In the Dubai ports deal, it didn't seem to matter that "the United States already prohibits foreign direct investment in such industries as maritime [e.g., Dubai Ports World], aircraft, banking, resources, and power. Generally, these sectors were closed to foreign investors to prevent public services and public interest activities from falling under foreign control, but again primarily for national defense purposes."(33)
The Exon-Florio law under which CFIUS operates was written so that it "gives the President broad powers to block certain types of foreign investment" especially those involving issues of national security.(33)
The NEW 'Mall of America'!
Little did they know that CFIUS and President Bush would run this country like a giant shopping mall. We find that BOTH parties willfully ignored the national security issues raised by multiple federal agencies during their review of the Dubai Ports World deal.
Outrageously, after the Dubai Ports World debacle, CFIUS decided to sell U.S. military parts manufacturing facilities to Dubai. Yet another anti-security deal. This time there were no objections heard from Congress. Perhaps they were too 'worn out' from racing to the TV cameras during the 'ports deal' which left them incapable of proffering any objections against a similar national security issue.(34)(35)
What Other 'Fire Sales' of Taxpayer Paid Infrastructure Have Been Made? Read on . . .
How many other secret deals and secret meetings to sell our infrastructure to foreign countries have there been, and will there be in the future? Look around, see all of the infrastructure paid for with our tax dollars that is up for sale to the highest bidder. Roads, bridges, ports, waterworks. It doesn't matter WHO the buyers are!
One example . . . "RWEAG, a German owned utility company purchased the American Water Works in 2001 for $7.6 billion. the American Water Works was founded in 1886 and serves 1,300 communities in 23 states from the East Coast to the West Coast." But guess what . . . its up for sale again! And, because of "unusually high rate increases and declining maintenance" . . . America's mayors are saying "we want control of our own water."(36)
Another example . . . "On a single day in June, an Australian-Spanish partnership paid $3.8 billion to lease the Indiana Toll Road. An Australian company bought a 99-year lease on Virginia's Pocahontas Parkway, and Texas officials decided to let a Spanish-American partnership build and run a toll road from Austin to Seguin for 50 years."(37)
In Chicago "last year, the city sold a 99-year lease on the eight-mile Chicago Skyway for $1.83 billion. The buyer was the same consortium that leased the Indiana Toll Road -- Macquarie Infrastructure Group of Sydney, Australia, and Cintra Concessiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte of Madrid, Spain."(37)
In Orange County, CA . . . [t]he road, part of state Route 91, was built and run for $130 million by California Private Transportation Company, partly owned by France-based Compagnie Financiere et Industrielle des Autoroutes. The toll road opened in 1995. Seven years later, Orange County was looking at gridlock. But it could not build more roads because of a provision in the lease. So it bought back the lease -- for $207.5 million.(37)
A Compilation of Still More Examples . . .
"Virtually every week brings fresh evidence that highway tolling and private financing are gaining new converts among governors and state transportation officials, in state legislatures, and in the media. Growing transportation budget shortfalls, eroding value of highway tax revenues and a supportive federal policy toward tolling and public-private partnerships have helped to nurture the idea. Fanning its spread are visions of highway projects built entirely with private funds, and prospects of multi-billion-dollar concessionary cash payments that could jump start ambitious transportation improvements years in advance of their planned execution."(38)
The highways were built with taxpayer dollars and the new owners intend to make you pay tolls on roads you have built. To whom do we turn if they do not maintain and upgrade the infrastructures when needed? Will they be accountable to 'We the People?' One concept behind the Eisenhower national interstate system was that it was to be FREE. Clinton's Executive Order put an end to that and our Congress went right along. Lastly, these private companies will use the Supreme Court's Kelo decision to permit the TAKING of private property for private gain. And . . . these entities will hire Washington insiders to pry every single dollar from the federal government they can while building these toll road systems.
As for the those who have spoken out and 'hit the nail on the head' . . . "Patrick Bauer, the Indiana House's Democratic leader, says such deals are taxpayer rip-offs. Bauer believes Macquarie-Cintra could make $133 billion over the 75-year life of the Indiana Toll Road lease -- for which Indiana got $3.8 billion. 'In five, maybe 10 years, all that money is gone, and the tolls keep rising and the money keeps flowing into the foreign coffers,' . . ."(39)
Who's Responsible For The Massive Push To Sell America Out From Underneath Us?
It is a fact that the direct selling of our infrastructure to foreign countries is in violation of the Constitution, Article I, Section 10, Clause 3. It is also a fact that such sales are in direct contravention of the Exon-Florio laws which mandates the prohibition of "foreign direct investment in maritime, aircraft, banking, resources and power." Why then is the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (CFIUS), which conveniently falls under the aegis of the U.S. Treasury Department, and individual local or state governments being allowed to continue doing so with regularity and rapidly accelerating speed?
As for WHY our infrastructure is being auctioned off to the highest bidder, mostly foreign investors, the answer is because George H. W. Bush, a One World Monopolist, wrote and signed an Executive Order (E.O.) 12803 on April 30, 1992 commanding that it be done. That E.O. was published in only two places, Cornell University and on waterindustry.org.
Executive Order 12803, Section 1 under 'Definitions' it states the following . . . "For the purpose of this order:
(a) 'Privatization' means the disposition of or transfer of an infrastructure asset [read taxpayer funded and owned], such as by sale or by long-term lease, from State or local government to a private party.
(b) 'Infrastructure asset' means any asset financed in whole or in part by the Federal Government [read taxpayer financed] and needed for the functioning of the economy [if we need it why are we selling it?]. Examples of such assets include, but are not limited to: roads, tunnels, bridges, electricity supply facilities, mass transit, rail transportation, airports, ports, waterways, water supply facilities, recycling and wastewater treatment facilities, solid waste disposal facilities, housing, schools, prisons and hospitals." A BREATHTAKING LIST!
Following Bush's lead, Bill Clinton, issued another unlawful Executive order E.O. 12893, which, just like all the actions prompted by the Shadow Government, is ALSO a little known fact.
You can find a comprehensive list of America's taxpayer financed roads being sold to the highest bidder via Public Private Partnerships (PPP). Take note that the word 'partnerships' is a euphemistic term which really means the fascist blending of private (corporate) and public (government) in 'partnerships' to the everlasting detriment of America's security and sovereignty, not to mention the violation of our Constitution and laws.
There are even seminars provided to teach state and local government officials how to go about selling our taxpayer financed infrstructures to foreign private investment groups. There will be a "North American Private Partnerships Intensive Seminar, . . . held at the Hyatt Regency in Miami, March 19 to 21 . The cost will be $3,500 [probably paid by taxpayer dollars] per attendee."
Our country is being sold out from beneath us, often to foreign entities who will control them in times of national emergencies and in violation of the Exon-Florio law and our Constitution. All is being accomplished while many Americans remain uninformed by the media AND those who loudly object are being ignored or silenced by the fascist One World Monopolists, in collusion with the corrupt main stream media, in their drive to conquer America from within.
America's Trucking Industry Will Be Jeopardized
"The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association came out this month in opposition to any Mexican truck pilot program. Todd Spencer, the association's executive vice president, said the program would jeopardize safety on U.S. roads and would lead to an influx of cheap Mexican labor . . . [said:] 'A move by the U.S. Department of Transportation to open U.S. roadways to Mexican trucks puts the interest of foreign trade and cheap labor ahead of everything else, including highway safety, homeland security and the well being of hardworking Americans' . . ."(40)
The Gathering Storm Clouds Are Approaching . . .
"There is a plan no one talks about very much, one that floats over the horizon like an approaching storm at sea. In this business dream, the Pacific ports of the United States will be shifted south to new massive anchorages in Mexico . . . These new ports will be linked by major train and truck arteries -- NAFTA Corridors -- to the cities of the United States and Canada. Mexican trucking companies will be bought (and are being bought up now) by American firms and Mexican truckers will deliver the freight and freely drive all U.S. highways. In this plan, the shipping of the United States leaves [out] union ports and the long haul trucking leaves [out] union drivers."(41)
"An enlarged I-35 will reach north from the sister cities of Laredo/Nuevo Laredo 1,600 miles to Canada via San Antonio, Austin, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Kansas City, the Twin Cities and Duluth and I-69 will originate at the same crossing and streak north to Michigan. Each corridor will be about 1,200 feet wide. Six lanes will be dedicated to cars, four to trucks and in the middle will be rail and utilities. The goods will come from new Mexican ports on the Pacific coast. At the moment, at least five such corridors are on the drawing boards."(41)
In a story called 'The NAFTA Trucker' an investigative reporter by the name of Charles Bowden wrote a story for the November 1999 issue of The Teamster in which he exposed a story about Mexican long haul drivers who are woefully exploited, exhausted by the exorbitant hours they are forced to drive so they use cocaine and amphetamines, etc., all the while driving notoriously poorly maintained vehicles.
In the August 2006 Teamsters magazine, seven years later, he writes that "NOTHING HAS CHANGED" and Mexican truck drivers and their rigs are still grossly 'unsafe at any speed.'
Help Comes From the Courts to Smooth the Way for the NAU
Oh, by the way, did you know that on "June 7, 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court reached a unanimous decision in Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen, ruling that Mexican trucks under NAFTA could enter the U.S. freely, even if the Mexican trucks failed to meet environmental standards as set by state and federal law."(42)
How devastating can those emissions become? "An estimated 63,000 Mexican trucks crossed the border last year , making 4.3 million crossings, mostly through Texas."(43) Today in 2006 the number of crossings is much higher and the planned NASCO super highway will escalate the traffic exponentially.
Of the road infrastructure already sold in California: "Each major transportation mode already faces serious limitations in capacity, but huge growth is predicted for all kinds of cargo traffic, including the NAFTA trade. According to SCAG, [Southern California Assn. of Governments] two million trucks traveled northbound/southbound across the California/Baja California border in 2003. That was before the Supreme Court okayed Mexican trucks and buses for full U.S. access and before implementation of the recently-approved Central American Free Trade Agreement [CAFTA]."(44)
How rampant is the selling or leasing of roads and bridges? The following article lists those already completed and those that are waiting in line and planning to be sold or leased to foreign entities: (45)
Furthermore " . . . the Communist Chinese Army now controls the Panama Canal and also controls port terminals in Seattle, Washington, and Long Beach, California . . . America's leaders are willfully and deliberately outsourcing every viable asset we have to foreign countries. Ever since President Bill Clinton and Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole collaborated to ram NAFTA and GATT down our throats, the rush to outsource America's jobs, industries, and even our security has been in full wing (and FTAA is just around the corner)."(46)
A Chilling Message From the Office of the U.S. Attorney General
Didn't you ever wonder why our government is prosecuting border patrol agents for doing their job?
Did you know that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rules state: "It is a violation of Border Patrol regulations to go after someone who is fleeing." . . . "The Border Patrol pursuit policy prohibits the pursuit of someone." To repeat: "Agents are not allowed to pursue. In order to exceed the speed limit, you have to get supervisor approval . . . "(47)
Michael Chertoff Gonzales & Bush
One of the two agents said: "How are we supposed to follow the Border Patrol strategy of apprehending terrorists or drug smugglers if we are not supposed to pursue fleeing people? . . . Everybody who's breaking the law flees from us. What are we supposed to do? Do they want us to catch them or not?"(47) Apparently not!
In order to prosecute two border patrol agents, one of whom was up for Border Patrol Agent of the Year, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General, investigator Christopher Sanchez sought out the Mexican national whose abandoned van contained 800 pounds of Marijuana and was shot in the buttocks as he fled to another waiting van on the Mexican side of the border. "The smuggler was given full immunity to testify against the agents and complete medical care at William Beaumont Army Medical Center, in El Paso [Texas]."(47)
The agents, Ramos and Compean, face 20 years in prison after being convicted of "assault with serious bodily injury; assault with a deadly weapon; discharge of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence; and civil rights violation . . . The smuggler is now suing the Border Patrol for $5 million for violating his civil rights."(47)
TJ Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council, the union representing border agents said the Border Patrol's official pursuit policy handcuffs agents in the field . . . The administration is trying to intimidate front-line agents from doing their job . . . If they can't do it administratively, they'll do it with trumped-up criminal charges."(47)
Andy Ramirez of the nonprofit group "Friends of the Border Patrol' said: "This is the greatest miscarriage of justice I have ever seen . . . [the prosecution] has sent a very loud message to the other Border Patrol agents: If you confront a smuggler, this is what will happen to you."(48)
Are your outraged yet?. . . Have you 'connected the dots' yet?
Why ARE Our Borders STILL Wide Open, Our Laws Unenforced and Massive Amnesty Proffered . . .
Why does our government tyrannically trample on the rights of American citizens with impunity while it permits, and tacitly condones the racist, reconquista rabble in our streets and on our campuses by allowing them to flood across our borders and remain here unmolested? Could it be they WANT the reconquista rabble to foment their anti-Americanism, hostility, balkanization, racism, sedition, while they flaunt their anarchy?
Is there something more to the story than illegal aliens rampaging in our streets calling for 'rights' which they have NO RIGHT to get? Lawbreakers who profess their allegiance to Mexico and other Latin American countries, defiling our flag, re-writing our National Anthem, shouting racist slogans on behalf of 'La Raza' ('The Race' which is ironically NOT a race).
Can the deliberate non-action of our government to stop the massive 20-30 million illegal alien invasion of our country actually be part of a some hidden agenda?
In Order To Answer ALL of Those Disturbing Questions . . .
You need to understand that the illegal alien invasion is simply a diversion to keep our focus off the imminent implementation of the North American Union (NAU), the next step towards a One World Order (OWO). The illegal alien invasion is a tool being used to segue America into the North American Union. Just think about the DEFIANT Senate amnesty bill S. 2611 which insanely includes all manner of benefits, rights, privileges, 'a path to citizenship,' major increases in job stealing high tech visas AND a tripling of quotas for LEGAL immigration which is already over a million per year which does not include those seeking asylum.(49)
Why did the Senate do such an insane thing in TOTAL and COMPLETE opposition to 'We the People' and in such abject disregard for the horrendous consequences it will foist upon our nation's future? It is, without doubt . . . "an 'open borders manifesto,' a nation killer."(50)
The answer is as plain as the nose on your face. Many in the Senate AND the House AND the Executive are working in concert to create a North American Union. They are capitalists whose agenda is Communism which makes them classic fascists. They embrace the concept of a world run by a wealthy few, which they apparently believe will be themselves. Their goal is to achieve the few remaining unfulfilled tenets of the Communist Manifesto in order to put an end to America.
How Dishonest and Corrupt IS our Congress?
Did you know that, in 1999 and 2000, presidential candidate and then president-elect Vicente Fox had a foreign relations aide who met with "almost 80 U.S. congressmen and senators during numerous trips and at several events." The aide, Fredo Arias-king, attests that: "With just over 50 of them, my colleagues and I spoke about immigration in some depth, as it is one of the important bilateral topics [for Mexico]."(51)
They found that: "American politicians are overwhelmingly pro-immigration, for a variety of reasons, and they do not always admit this to their constituents. Of those 50 legislators, 45 were unambiguously pro-immigration, even asking us at times to 'send more.' This was true of both Democrats and Republicans."(51)
His conclusions: "If an orgnizable mass of Americans comes to suspect that mass immigration from Latin America is being used by the political class to undermine their democracy and as a tool to liberate the political elites from the Jeffersonian and Madisonian constraints, then indeed we may witness a reaction-but hopefully not against the immigrants themselves, as they are also objects of elite manipulations in more than one country."(51)
All Along, The Government's Diabolical Plan Has Been As Follows:
The illegal alien problem is simply the MECHANISM for leveraging what is yet to come. Once the civil unrest and chaos caused by the overwhelming 'human tsunami' of illegal aliens reduces America to complete anarchy, a state of total lawlessness and riots (they can't be race riots because Hispanics are comprised of ALL races) or the bird flu pandemic arrives, or another 'Katrina' occurs, or a 'dirty bomb' is unleashed . . . the federal government will institute martial law. One of those events or some other inventive pretext will then allow the 'Shadow Government' to step forward and VISIBLY take over our country. They will use martial law to install a socialist-Communist-Marxist One World Order (OWO) dictatorial government in plain sight instead of clandestinely as they do now.(52)(53)
If you think those statements are too far fetched and bizarre to believe? You will change your mind completely once you have read and digested all of the information exposed in this report. The information will come primarily from GOVERNMENT websites. It will all be documented with clickable URL 'addresses' to the source material which is listed below as 'References' and tagged numerically throughout the next part of this expose. If you don't believe what is written . . . then do your own research and checking.
You will be stunned beyond belief at the nearly complete destruction of our sovereignty, Constitution, Bill of Rights and our Republic that has been accomplished thus far while the fascist cabal deviously 'hides in plain sight.' All has been completed without ANY proper oversight by our Congress nor the knowledge or sanction by 'We the People.' How are they doing it? Read on . . .
NAFTA Morphs Into the SPP and the NAU Plot Emerges
by AP/WWP The self-proclaimed Three Amigos
The tri-lateral cabal headed by President Fox, Prime Minister Martin, and President Bush have used NAFTA as a Trojan horse to create the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) which was officially announced on March 23, 2005, in Waco, Texas. The plan was little noticed when it was formally announced. Sadly it is . . . 'a day that will live in infamy!'
NAFTA, a supposed 'trade agreement' that has already cost millions of American jobs and closed many of our manufacturing plants has been deviously used to create the SPP. It was an ignominious day for America and all she stands for when the heads of state from three sovereign countries (Mexico, Canada and America) could simply mutually agree to deviously pervert the NAFTA agreement and create the SPP.(54)(55)(56)
Having made their official announcement, President Bush believed he was then entitled to order the executive branch of our government to do his bidding to create the NAU under cover of the SPP without any oversight by Congress or informing the American public.
Ergo, by presidential fiat, Bush has created "an end run around America's sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece" or rather 'department by department' just as announced by CFR member Richard Gardner in his 1974 Foreign Affairs article.
The Early Warning 'Wake up' Call from Mexico:
"Their ideas are being implemented through the signing of 'regulations,' not subject to citizens' review. This vision may initially have been labeled NAFTA Plus, but the name gives a mistaken impression of what is at hand, since there will be no single treaty text, no unique label to facilitate keeping tabs. Perhaps for this reason, some civil society groups are calling the phenomenon by another name, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPPNA), an official sobriquet for the summits held by the three chief executives to agree on the future of 'North America'. . . . This explains in part why deeper integration is taking place through a series of regulations and executive decrees that avoid citizen watchdogs and legislative oversight. Activist civil society organizations have to work overtime to keep up."(57)
Joined by their advisors, President George W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and Mexican
President Vicente Fox meet at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, during a March 23, 2005.
White House photo by Eric Draper. (58)
President George W. Bush talks privately with Mexican President Vicente Fox, center, and Canadian Prime
Minister Paul Martin, right, during a March 23, 2005, trilateral meeting at Baylor University in Waco, Texas.
White House photo by Eric Draper. (58)
President George W. Bush walks with Mexico President Vicente Fox, left, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul
Martin upon their arrival Wednesday, March 23, 2005, at the Bill Daniels Activity Center at Baylor University
in Waco, Texas.
White House photo by Eric Draper. (58)
President George W. Bush talks with Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin, left, and Mexican President
Vicente Fox, right, during their March 23, 2005, trilateral meeting at Baylor University in Waco, Texas.
White House photo by Eric Draper. (58)
Bush intends to end U.S. sovereignty in order to create the North American Union. The President is stealthily creating a unified continent wide economic and political entity similar to the European Union. He is following the blueprint laid out in a 2005 report entitled Building a North American Community: Report of an Independent Task Force, by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which was preceded in 2001 by CFR member Dr. Robert Pastor's book titled: Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New and several iterations in between.
The Pastor book and many other similar earlier CFR reports reveals the nexus to Bush and explains the administration's DELIBERATE unenforcement of our immigration laws and DHS' insane policies such as 'catch and release' and others that were used to keep the borders open. Such actions or non-actions and inexplicable policies were purposefully employed to create a de facto elimination of our borders . . . a major prerequisite for the North American Union.
The Corporate Takeover Of America . . .
At this very symbolic 'round table' picture you are seeing the REAL government of America, who are busy selling out our sovereignty, and our freedoms!
Bush has created, engaged and promoted North American Competitiveness Council. What is their mission and goal? "INCREASING PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT in the SPP by adding high-level BUSINESS INPUT will ASSIST GOVERNMENTS in enhancing North America's competitive position and ENGAGE THE PRIVATE SECTOR AS PARTNERS IN FINDING SOLUTIONS. The Council will:
Consider issues that could be addressed trilaterally or bilaterally, as improvements in our bilateral relationships enhance North American competitiveness.
Address issues of immediate importance and provide strategic medium and long-term advice.
Provide input on the compatibility of our security and prosperity agendas, given the linkages between security and prosperity in a global marketplace.
Offer ideas on the private sector's role in promoting North American competitiveness."(59)
Wealthy corporate globalists, such as the Rockefellers, are working in concert with many in positions of power in our courts, military, and government who are members of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, and attend the Bilderberg conferences. Their overarching desire is to create world political dominion controlled by corporate monopolies. Their goals are rooted in the ideologies of socialism, Communism, and Marxism. Collectively, they working diligently and secretly to create a FASCIST One World Order.
Long ago fascism was defined by Mussolini as the COMBINING OF GOVERNMENT (i.e., the 'state') and CAPITALISM (i.e., the 'corporate and military-industrial complex'), or as Mussolini re-framed fascism as being 'corporatism' to emphasize the corporate involvement. Fascism, Nazism, and Communism, are ALL varying forms of totalitarian police states and unfortunately . . . WE HAVE BECOME A BLEND OF ALL THREE! Think not? Then read the list the of forty-five goals straight out of the Communist Manifesto, which was published in the United States Congressional Record in 1963, found here: (60) The civilian prison camps await We the People:
The North American Union is but a stepping stone. Once our American sovereignty, Constitutional Republic and laws are superceded by a EU police state communist government, it will be the last major hurdle for the globalists.
What the Elite Globlists Seek . . .
Their basic fundamental desire is to increasingly transform our system of governance so that "we are moving from the system of representative government set forth in the U.S. Constitution to a system of collaborative policymaking by professional bureaucrats and business leaders. This outcome is precisely what the President's Council on Sustainable Development called for in its 1993 We Believe Statements . . ."(61)(62)
Cancun, Mexico - the Trilateral Cabal Meet Again and . . .
The 'new kid on the block' Prime Minister Harper of Canada stated: "We committed to further engage the private sector. We've agreed to set up a North American Competitiveness Council, made up of business leaders from all three countries, to advise us on ways to improve the competitiveness of our economies. They will meet with our ministers, identify priorities, and make sure we follow up and implement them."(63)
President Fox chimed in with: "We have come to an end in this productive meeting, as you well know, with bilateral meetings yesterday, and today a trilateral meeting, a very productive one, followed by an enlarged meeting, trilateral-wise, with the attendance of the entrepreneurial community, business and investment of our three countries."(63)
Three globablist elites and their coterie of wealthy puppet masters, governmental conspirators and CFR accomplices have collectively . . . piece, by piece made bi-lateral and tri-lateral agreements that have essentially eliminated our sovereignty without our consent. What they are putting into place has NO congressional approval or oversight, let alone approval from 'We the People.'
They are doing it through the State Department which is headed by Rice (CFR) and filled with CFR members. Other governmental department that are involved include Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense (Trilateral Commission and former CFR member). Chao (CFR) Secretary of Labor, Paulson, (CFR) the new Secretary of Treasury (former Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs), and the new CIA chief Hayden (CFR). Essentially ALL the departments of the federal government's executive branch are involved in the destruction of our Constitution, Bill of Rights, laws and sovereignty. The 'Shadow Government' is an EYELASH away from taking over!
Their Plan to Kill America by Stealth . . .
Arrogantly . . . without submission to Congress for discussion and debate, or providing any ongoing major media exposure, President Bush issued executive orders to create 'working groups,' in most, if not all of the Departments of the Executive Branch under the direction and management of the Department of Commerce.
Instead they posted on the spp.gov website: "Following the March 23, 2005, launch of the SPP, each nation established Security and Prosperity working groups to fulfill the vision of the North American Heads of State. The working groups will consult with stakeholders; set specific, measurable, and achievable goals and implementation dates; and identify concrete steps the governments can take to achieve these goals. An initial report is due to Heads of Government on June 23 with semi-annual progress reports thereafter."(64)
Just how will they do their 'end run around our sovereignty', eliminate the protection of our Constitution which George Bush calls "nothing but a goddamned piece of paper" and erode our Bill of Rights and freedoms? Exactly as CFR author Richard N. Gardner said they would . . . 'from the bottom up . . . piece by piece'.
Their methodology for accomplishing their goals include CFR 'task force' prescribed agendas and initiatives that will be actively pursued by 'working groups' inside the executive branch of our government. "Nearly every work plan is characterized by action steps described variously as 'our three countries signed a Framework of Common Principles' . . . or 'we have signed a Memorandum of Understanding . . . or 'we have signed a declaration of intent' . . . etc. Once again, none of the 30 or so working agendas makes any mention of submitting decisions to the U.S. Congress for review and approval. No new U.S. laws are contemplated for the Bush administration to submit to Congress. Instead, the plan is obviously to knit together the North American Union completely under the radar, through a process of regulations and directives issued by various U.S. government agencies."(65)
Creating Stealth 'Working Groups' in the Dept. of Commerce . . .
Carlos M. Gutierrez
35th U.S. Secretary of Commerce,
sworn in on February 7, 2005
Manufactured Goods & Sectoral and Regional Competitiveness Working Group . . . ensure compatibility of regulations and standards and eliminating redundant testing and certification requirements. Explore new approaches to enhance the competitiveness of North American industries by promoting greater cooperation in sectors such as autos, steel, and other sectors identified through consultations.
E-Commerce & ICT Working Group . . . agree on mutual recognition of technical requirements for telecommunications equipment, tests and certification; adopt a framework of common principles for e-commerce).
Energy Working Group . . . facilitating investment in energy infrastructure, . . . enhancing cooperation to identify and utilize best practices, streamline and update regulations.
Transportation Working Group . . . expanding market access, facilitating multimodal corridors, reducing congestion, and alleviating bottlenecks at the border that inhibit growth . . . initiate an Aviation Safety Agreement process, pursue smart border information technology initiatives, ensure compatibility of regulations and standards in areas such as statistics, motor carrier and rail safety, and working with responsible jurisdictions, develop mechanisms for enhanced road infrastructure planning, including an inventory of border transportation infrastructure in major corridors and public-private financing instruments for border projects).
Food & Agriculture Working Group . . . enhanced laboratory coordination and information sharing; and increasing cooperation in the development of regulatory policy related to the agricultural biotechnology sectors in Canada, Mexico and the United States, through the work of the North American Biotechnology Initiative (NABI).
Environment Working Group . . . Develop complementary strategies for oceans stewardship by emphasizing an ecosystem approach, coordinating and integrating existing marine managed areas, and improving fisheries management.
Financial Services Working Group . . . further collaboration on training programs for bank, insurance and securities regulators and supervisors.
Business Facilitation Working Group . . . facilitate further the movement of business persons within North America
Movement of Goods Working Group . . . procedures to allow speedy implementation of rules of origin modifications. Increase competitiveness by exploring additional supply chain options, such as by rationalizing minor differences in external tariffs, consistent with multilateral negotiation strategies.
Health . . . cooperative efforts under the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, work towards the identification and adoption of best practices relating to the registration of medicinal products.(64)
A phone call to the 'Office of Public Affairs' for the Dept. of Commerce found that the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is being called a 'project.' That was the response to a query as to why the department's organizational list did not include a section called 'Security and Prosperity Partnership.' Now . . . why do you suppose they do not have it listed as a component of the Dept. of Commerce? Why the 'low key' innocuous identification of a major emphasis towards a North American Union called just a 'project'? Could it be more acts of stealth?(66)
An interesting fact is that Carlos Gutierrez, the Secretary of Commerce, was born in Havana, Cuba and educated in Mexico.(67)
The SPP is Creating Stealth Agreements Euphemistically Called . . .
Framework of Common Principles
Liberalization of Rules of Origin
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Arrangement on the Use of
Memorandum of Agreement
Trilateral Documents setting out each country's procedures and planned changes
Signed Declarations of Intent
Harmonizing Strategies Agreed Upon
Harmonizing approaches discussed and created
Totalization Agreements (INCLUDING social security)(68)
Public-Private Partnerships = Government-Business Partnerships
BUSINESS OWNERS with vested economic interests are gleefully gaining direct access to the GOVERNMENT who is facilitating their interests. Under the aegis of the SPP, businesses are gaining entrée and accommodations directly from government departments in the executive branch without intercession and oversight by congress in order to protect 'We the People' from a government by plutocracy.
According to Patrick Kilbride, executive director of the Council of the Americas' North American Business Committee "in partnership with United Parcel Service (UPS), will provide [on January 10-11, 2006] North American business leaders and government officials an opportunity for dialogue on the development and implementation of the SPP . . . More than 40 private sector participants from companies including Ford Motor Company, Tyco, Exxon Mobil and Grupo IMSA are expected to join government officials from the U.S. departments of State and Commerce, Mexico's Secretariat of Foreign Relations and Canada's Ministry of Industry at the forum in Louisville, Kentucky . . ."(69)
Kilbride said: 'We see the SPP as a remarkable initiative by the North American governments and we want to ensure it gets the full support from the private sector that it deserves,' . . . We see this as an opportunity to bring key 'stakeholders' together in a collegial and collaborative environment to advance our mutual goals in trade and security . . . Kilbride . . . hopes the SPP forum will lay a foundation for future public-private sector collaboration."(69)
Dwindling American Auto Manufacturers Jump Onboard the SPP Band Wagon . . .
"As part of the SPP process, the North American automotive industry, represented by all major manufacturers and their suppliers from the United States, Canada and Mexico, recently established the Automotive Partnership Council of North America (APCNA), and identified an initial list of priority action items."(70)
"The automotive industry is the single largest manufacturing sector in North America and represents the largest component of trade between Canada, the United States and Mexico. The success and competitiveness of the North American automotive industry stems in large part from the regional integration of the industry."(70)
"The associations and companies involved in the APCNA are eager to work together as an industry in cooperation with our partners in government to strengthen the regional competitiveness and prosperity of our industry across North America."(70)
Translated . . . regional integration means that more American automobile factories will move to Mexico, and now that CAFTA is signed, to other Latin American countries for even cheaper labor and little or no environmental or labor laws to hinder them. The plutocracy marches on under the SPP-NAFTA flag:
Reuters reported that Ford Motor Co. is slashing 30,000 jobs and closing 14 plants in the United States and is preparing to invest up to $9.2 billion in Mexico from 2006 to 2012 and create up to 150,000 jobs as detailed in a confidential, 28-page document turned over to the Oakland Press in Detroit, by a Ford employee.
According to the document: "The Way Forward - Mexico (offers an) opportunity to further leverage Ford of Mexico cost advantage and location to reduce corporate fixed costs . . . We will leverage our global scale like never before and Mexico is a key partner as we're targeting lower fixed costs, better quality and speed to deliver our Way Forward plans . . . "(71)
Could It Be Just A Coincidence That . . .
The creation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is EXACTLY what was planned by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) as noted in their 47 page FINAL Report, dated May 2005. The report was published just three months after the WACO, Texas meeting between the three heads of state. How were they able to so quickly issue a FINAL report when the concept had just been officially announced? The answer is that there were many preceding 'blueprints' by the CFR detailing 'how to' create the NAU by using NAFTA 'on steroids' as the basis for the SPP. In particular, the CFR's Dr. Robert A. Pastor 'shopped' the concept around in books, monographs, speeches before the Trilateral Commission, and by providing 'expert testimony before Canada's Parliament and the US Congress.(72)
For YEARS the CFR's had been calling for the erasure of our borders. Dr. Pastor, a CFR task force Vice-Chair, had been trumpeting the concept just about everywhere it mattered, working hard to achieve the CFR's stated goals. All the while 'We the People' were 'left out of the loop' until Lou Dobbs exposed the CFR's plans. Please watch the video tape of Pastor's testimony before Congress when he announced that our borders are to be eliminated by 2010. See Pastor's testimony and Lou Dobbs reaction to it here.(73)
The CFR and hundreds its of members have infiltrated our government at all levels . . . the legislative, the executive, the courts, and the military. They are the driving force and facilitators behind the CFR's publicly stated position that says the following: "An annual summit of North American leaders would do more to carry out our [CFR's] overall goal of creating a North American Community than virtually any of the report's other recommendations. As we have seen with the annual Group of Seven/Eight (G-7/8) and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summits, regular meetings of leaders not only help promote a sense of community and shared objectives, but channel the various bureaucracies each year to work on those common objectives."(72)
"Whether on matters of security, education, or economic integration and development, annual summits will drive a process that will hasten the goals that we outline in our report. More to the point, an annual summit can be announced and implemented right away, giving tangible impetus to the good beginning made at the March 2005 summit and to the goals we promote here."(72) Get the picture?
The CFR had reason to rejoice because: "At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts."(72)
Although there are those who would deny there is ANY connection between the CFR and the North American Union, they are simply in severe denial, dupes or part of the cabal and working to cover up the truth.
The CFR's Dr. Robert Pastor Envisions the Future of the NAU . . .
You will need to re-read the following several times to grasp the enormity of what Pastor and the CFR has proposed for America. It will TAKE YOUR BREATH AWAY!
"Pastor told the Trilateral Commission in 2002 that the North American Union needed to implement a series of political proposals which would have authority over the sovereignty of the United States, Canada and Mexico. Specifically, Pastor called for the creation of North American passports and a North American Customs and Immigrations, which would have authority over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security. A North American Parliamentary Group would oversee the U.S. Congress. A Permanent Court on Trade and Investment would resolve disputes within NAFTA, exerting final authority over the judgments of the U.S. Supreme Court. A North American Commission would 'develop an integrated continental plan for transportation and infrastructure'."(74)
Watch this sickening video where a pair of the Trilateral Commission's most famous stalwarts, Dick Cheney and David Rockefeller, pat each other's back. The diabolical duo are at a meeting where they are planning for the final 'nail in America's coffin' called the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). (75)
Discover What Covert Operations Are Being Conducted Under the SPP . . .
Go to SPP.gov and see for yourself. Be sure to put on your propaganda filter before entering the website. Pay attention to how cleverly they clothe their treasonous acts with self-effacing, feel good words like 'prosperity.' Be sure and ask yourself . . . 'prosperity' for WHOM, those Americans whose jobs and manufacturing has already disappeared? Be sure and ask yourself . . . 'security' for WHOM once they erase our borders and eliminate our sovereignty? Be sure and ask yourself . . . 'partnership' with WHOM and by WHOM? Thus far it is a partnership between Fox, Harper and Bush in collusion with businesses and the banking community. NOT with the American people and/or their duly elected representatives in the legislature.
Americans need to become suspicious about what's going on right under their own noses and in their own back yard. You need to get out from behind the television and WORK to ferret out for yourself what is happening because the silence from the main stream media is part of the treason.
Beware of the 'North American Competitiveness Council' it is FASCISM PERSONIFIED!
That Council will create ever increasing private sector engagement under the SPP by adding high-level business input will assist governments in enhancing North America's competitive position and engage the private sector as partners in finding solutions.(76)
Meeting on June 15, 2006 . . . the "U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Mexican Economy Minister Sergio Garcia de Alba and Canadian Minister of Industry Maxime Bernier . . . met with North American business leaders to officially launch the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC). In March of 2006 Bush, Harper, and Fox, announced the creation of the NACC as a priority to their commitment to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). "The SPP is built on the North American Free Trade Agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico (NAFTA) which entered into force on January 1, 1994."(77)
At the meeting Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez stated that: "Today is a continuation of President Bush's strong commitment to our North American partners to focus on North America's security and prosperity . . . "The private sector is the driving force behind innovation and growth, and the private sector's involvement in the SPP is key to enhancing North America's competitive position in global markets."(77)
"The NACC is made up of high level business leaders from each country. Each country's council consists of ten members who will meet annually with the SPP Prosperity and Security Ministers to provide recommendations and priorities on promoting North American competitiveness globally. In addition, the governments of North America will work with the NACC to remove barriers in order to increase the competitiveness of North American firms in the global marketplace and spur economic growth."(77)
At that same June meeting . . . "the SPP Prosperity Ministers, Secretary Gutierrez, Secretary Garcia de Alba and Minister Bernier, met to take stock of progress on the Prosperity component of the SPP. The SPP Security Ministers, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Canadian Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day and Mexican Secretary of Interior Carlos Abascal, are also taking stock of progress on the Security component with a view to releasing a report in July. The Security and Prosperity Ministers will hold a meeting with the NACC in early fall 2006 to discuss their priorities. They will also discuss updates to the work plans and consider new initiatives."(77)
As you review the documents from their official websites such as the Whitehouse.gov, SPP.gov, State.gov, or Canada.USembassy.gov you will notice that they NEVER mention WHO the 'high level business leaders' are or what industry, commerce or banks they represent. So in reality the information that they offer is just so much propaganda for the 'mushrooms' (i.e., 'We the People') whom they have deliberately keep in the dark and fed you know what.
You will NEVER see any reporting in the media because it is tightly controlled by a very few who are treasonously working in concert with the CFR and its agents and sympathizers of the 'Shadow Government.'
What You Can Do To Fight Back . . .
Get yourself a computer and learn how to 'surf' the internet. It is easy to learn and do. If my 80-year-old neighbor can do it . . . you can too. Do it because it is the last bastion of uncontrolled information left to you and it won't last too much longer because they are working and creating legislation to control the internet. One such law is called 'net neutrality!' Sounds innocent, doesn't it? It's just their way of conning you with their propaganda.
A computer is literally a 'window on the world' and best of all is that it is not totally and completely controlled by the media mafia that has a complete stranglehold on EVERYTHING you see, hear and read.
Get educated! Read these articles on 'Net Neutrality': House Turns Deaf Ear to Net Neutrality; The World's Worst Internet Laws Snaking Through the Senate; Follow the Net Neutrality Money Trail; and follow that with the truncated version of Why we should think twice about 'net neutrality' in support of net neutrality posted by Douglas Holtz-Eaken on the CFR website. Holtz-Eaken is the holder of the Paul A. Volker Chair in International Economics and Director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies. The article was originally posted in the 'Financial Times'.(78)(79)(80)(81)
Even when one DOES inquire into what's going on, we find Geri Word, head of the SPP office, who says their work has not been disclosed because: "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."(82) Uh . . . that's US! . . . 'We the People' not to mention the U.S. Congress. What arrogance! Be advised that you will find such arrogance to be a 'trademark' of the traitorous cabal.
Ms. Ward also suggested "that the work products of the working groups was described on the SPP website, so publishing the actual documents did not seem required."(82)
On the whitehouse.gov website you will find two reports: "The SPP of North America: Progress" and "Next Steps".(83)(59)
See if you think Tony Snow the 'Whitehouse Spokesperson' lied through is teeth when he was asked "Will the president categorically deny any interest in building a European Union-type superstate in North America?" He answered: "Of course, no. We're not interested. There is not going to be an EU in the US."(84)
And . . . Get Ready for the AMERO!
In his 2001 book, Dr. Robert A. Pastor, the 'Pied Piper' of the North American Union, called for a currency that will replace the Canadian and American dollars and the Mexican Peso. It is a concept that was discussed as early as 1999 by the Fraser Institute in Canada in a paper titled: The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union; and then again in 2002 in the Canadian House of Commons reporting to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade a report titled: Partners in North America Advancing Canada's Relations with the United States and Mexico; followed in 2004 at the University of California by a paper that addressed the North American Monetary Union: A United States Perspective.(85)(86)(87)
Meet Dr. Robert A. Pastor . . . 'Pied Piper' of the North American Union
Long before the 1994 NAFTA trade agreement morphed into a plan for the NAU called the SPP (signed March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas), Dr. Robert Pastor, a member of the CFR since 1997, had already made public in August 2001, his 'blueprint' for the NAU in a book titled: Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New.(88)
In his book Pastor discusses NAFTA and decries that: "The Canadian, Mexican, and US governments defined the [NAFTA] agreement so narrowly . . . [However] Vicente Fox Quesada, has boldly proposed transforming the free trade area into a common market like Europe's . . . [whereas the] United States, Canada, and Mexico need to modernize our relationship if we want the 21st Century to improve on the past. The three countries of North America already have a larger market than the European Union, but we have not begun to explore our potential as a diverse community."(88)
As detailed in the book . . . "Pastor seizes Fox's idea and maps out the paths toward making it a reality. He analyzes NAFTA's success and shortcomings, extracts lessons from the European Union's 40 years of reducing disparities between rich and poor countries, and proposes ways that NAFTA can adapt and incorporate those lessons." By 'adapt and incorporate' Pastor really means ALTER and INFLATE, or as they call it 'DEEPEN', a previously signed official agreement called NAFTA].(88)
The centerpiece of the book is a detailed proposal and specific recommendations for new institutions and 'North American policies', including plans for infrastructure and transportation, immigration and customs, a unified currency, and projects aimed to lift the poorer regions."(88)
So you see, according to Pastor, Fox IS running our country. Or . . . is it the other way around? As for 'lifting the poorer regions', which are in fact sovereign countries, everyone knows that means reducing the economies of the richer countries (Canada and the U.S.) in order to raise Mexico's. NAFTA has already reduced our wealth and prosperity and so now Dr. Pastor is prescribing more 'visionary reforms' that are 'part and parcel' of the NAFTA 'plus' which is the so called Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or SPP.
By Comparing The NAU To The European Union You Will Learn That . . .
The European Union (EU) began as a free-trade agreement in 1951 [just like our NAFTA the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994].
It then morphed into the European Economic Community (EEC) [Pastor is calling ours the North American Community].
Once the EEC was a reality and commonly accepted, it then morphed into the Common Market [ours is called the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)].
Deceptively, the Brits were sold the lie that is was just a 'common market' and thus joined up in January, 1973. Once they were sucked into the 'Common Market' it then went on to morph into the European Union (EU) [ours will be the North American Union (NAU)].
As it stands now the EU is well on its way to becoming a federalist superstate, which is expected to morph again and become the United States of Europe [ours will be the United States of the Americas (plural) when they finish combining North and South America into ONE, as is already planned].
The EU already has a single currency called the Euro [ours will be the Amero], and the European Union's unelected and unaccountable 'leaders' are working overtime to create ONE legal system, ONE military, ONE police force, ONE flag and ONE national anthem.
The EU is the SAME blueprint that the One World Monopolists are following here in America -- to the letter! They are creating the North American Union by . . . INCREMENTAL STEALTH. The only difference is that it took 50 years for the EU to get to where it is today. Unfortunately, unless we can stop them . . . they will accomplish the NAU here in the United States in a BREATHTAKING 15 years. That is their plan.
Are you ready to roll over and give up YOUR sovereignty?
To understand what happens when you give up your sovereignty to become the NAU . . . you MUST watch The Real Face of the European Union. It is a SHOCKING video documentary from 2004 that features EU insiders and commentators. Independent author Phillip Day covers the history and goals of the European Union, as well as the disturbing, irrevocable implications this new government has for every British citizen. He says that sadly, the mainstream media has refused comment, because the British press, just like ours, is totally controlled by the One World Monopolists.
Soon, for the European countries . . . ALL vestiges of national sovereignty will be ERASED FOREVER!
The question that needs to be asked is . . .
'Security' for whom? 'Prosperity' for whom? And 'partnership' with whom . . . three heads of state? A partnership with two countries that are incompatible socially, culturally (think also about French Quebec here), economically, and politically. Most importantly is the difference of our constitutions and legal systems. Why would America EVER want to merge with the corrupt oligarchy of Mexico, or the parlimentary style, socialist country of Canada? Do you?
Besides that, there is NO COMPARISON to the European Union's minimal differences between first world countries compared to the huge differences in the economies between a third-world country like Mexico and the US or Canada. There is a large glaring inequity in per capita GDP. For example: in 1999 the United States GDP was "$31,000; [for] Canada, $20,000, and Mexico, [it was] $4,900." But that fact pales in comparison to the language, educational and cultural differences between Mexico and the United States, where political graft and corruption is endemic throughout Mexican society where 'mordida' is an accepted and practiced way of life.(89)
In fact "despite Fox's best intentions and concrete efforts to clean up and improve Mexico's law enforcement, it is still riddled with corruption at all levels (like the rest of the country). If we compare Mexico to the European Union, the country doesn't fare too well. According to one survey, the 2001 Corruption Perception Index from Transparency International, Mexico ranks behind Greece, which had the worst record of any EU member. Greece ranked 42 and Mexico 51 on the list of 91 countries worldwide (Canada ranked 7th and the United States 16th)."(90)
Besides, the difference between 'rich and poor' countries Pastor constantly refers mainly to the WEALTH, or prosperity of the country and in the case of Mexico, Canada and the United States Dr. Pastor appears to completely ignore the enormous cultural, social, educational, legal, political, linguistic, and societal issues as if they were of little or no consequence. A glaring intellectual error.
What Else Does Dr. Pastor Reveal in His Book?
He promotes the following agenda and begins by saying that: "The United States and Mexico should use the state visit to Washington of President Vicente Fox of Mexico on September 4-7  to build on President Fox's bold proposals to launch the creation of a true North American Community. They should invite Canada to join them in creating a community that could:
integrate the infrastructure and transportation networks of North America;
create a development fund to reduce income disparities across the countries;
establish a North American Commission to prepare for the three leaders at their next Summit an agenda and options for promoting continental integration;
move toward a Customs Union in five years with a Permanent North American Court on Trade and Investment;
forge a more humane immigration policy that includes "North American passports" for frequent travelers, immigration preferences, and a larger temporary program with safeguards;
train North American customs and immigration officers to reduce duplication; and
eventually adopt a common currency.
According to Pastor, these proposals would be used to "deepen the current North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) . . ."(91)
'Deepen' . . . a very heady word. It does make one realize, as Webster's notes, that it is a word synonymous with "heighten, expand, extend, increase and intensify." That does about sum up what they have done with NAFTA in order in order to beget the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP).
The Pied Piper's Illustrious Network of Connections . . .
Apparently working overtime, Dr. Pastor has created a whole industry and network of organizations to bring 'gravitas' and prominence to his NAU position via teaching, research, and service. He has created: "The new Center for Democracy and Election Management [which] trains students, political leaders, journalists, and election managers from the US and abroad. The Center for North American Studies educates and conducts research about Canada, Mexico, and the United States with the aim of understanding and building a North American Community."(92)
Interestingly and of significance is that . . . Dr. Pastor is a member of the "Foreign Policy Advisory Committee for the National Council of La Raza [The Race]". La Raza . . . another of the well-funded treasonous, racist, anti-American, Hispanic organizations working hard to eliminate our borders in support illegal aliens. Their ultimate goals match perfectly.(93)
Dr. Pastor has been a "foreign policy advisor to each of the Democratic Presidential Candidates since 1976 . . . [and] Bill Clinton nominated him to be Ambassador to Panama."(92)
"From 1985-98, he was a fellow at the Carter Center and founding director of the Latin American and Caribbean Program, the Democracy Program, and the China Elections Project . . . Dr. Pastor served as [U.S.] national security advisor on Latin America (1977-81) and organized international delegations to mediate elections in 20 countries, including Mexico."(94)
"In addition, Dr. Pastor is the Executive Director of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, co-chaired by Jimmy Carter and James A. Baker, III."(95)
Now there's a scary bit of information. Think about those 'black boxes' the government keeps promoting and nearly everyone else distrusts, including many computer experts who have provided Congressional testimony revealing the flaws of electronic balloting.
Lastly the very busy Dr. Pastor participates in the following, which is but a very tiny part of his august résumé :
"Vice Chair, N.Y. Council on Foreign Relations Task Force [CFR] on the Future of North America, 2004-05.
Chairman, Board of Directors, North American Forum on Integration (NAFI), Montreal, Canada, 1999- 2004; Board of Directors, 1999-present.
Member, North American Committee, National Policy Association, 2001-2003.
Board of Directors, Common Cause Education Fund, 2000-2005
Historical Review Panel on De-Classification, Central Intelligence Agency, 1995-2005.
Committee on International Security Studies, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1992-present.
Professional Consultant to U.S. Government: National Security Council (1985-98); Department of State (1994-95); Department of Defense (1995) [Top Secret Clearance]"(93)
Does Sovereignty Matter to You?
In his Foreign Affairs article titled North America's Second Decade in January/February 2004, Pastor stated that: "NAFTA was merely the first draft of an economic constitution for North America. It was a deliberately lean document, intended only to dismantle barriers to trade and investment. Its architects planned neither for its success nor for the crises that would confront it. Although NAFTA fueled the train of continental integration, it did not provide conductors to guide it."(96)
If you have any doubts that the CFR has designs on destroying U.S. sovereignty the following statement by Pastor in that same CFR Foreign Affairs' publication reveals that is their position: "Opponents of integration often attack such proposals as threats to national sovereignty. Sovereignty, however, is not a fixed concept. In the past, Canada used sovereignty to keep out U.S. oil companies, Mexico relied on it to bar international election monitors, and the United States invoked it as an excuse to privilege "states' rights" over human rights. In each case, sovereignty was used to defend bad policies. Countries benefited when they changed these policies, and evidence suggests that North Americans [i.e., Mexicans, Americans and Canadians] are ready for a new relationship that renders this old definition of sovereignty obsolete."(96)
Are you ready to surrender your sovereignty to the global monopolists who want to erase America? Now we know where the globalists funded racist pro-illegal alien groups get their mantra about their entitlement to 'human rights' over our laws and sovereignty.
Also notice that Pastor calls our nation a STATE. We are a nation of MANY states and reject the perversion of such identification by the globalists and the United Nations. It is all part of their propaganda to brainwash us into giving up our Constitution, Bill of Rights, guns, private property and laws in order to achieve their Marxist-Communists goals of One World Disorder.
Lastly, did you know that the North America Union was in its second decade? Apparently Pastor started counting when NAFTA was born in 1994 and the CFR globalists thought they had their North American train on a path to their globalist nirvana. Instead it was a complete, unmitigated failure, except for those few at the very top of the corporate pile, so they followed up with creating the SPP and passing CAFTA and they are now working very hard pushing the FTAA . . . the final nail in America's sovereign coffin.
Why is the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) so bad for America? Because it is an attempt to expand the failed North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to every country in Central America, South America and the Caribbean, except Cuba. Negotiations began right after the completion of NAFTA in 1994 and were supposed to have been completed by January 1, 2005.
Since His Book in August 2001 . . . 'Pied Piper' Pastor Continues to Promote the CFR's 'Blueprint'
August 31, 2001: A Blueprint for a North American Community a News Release at the Institute for International Economics.
February 7, 2002: Invited Testimony of Dr. Robert A. Pastor Before the Standing Committee of Foreign Affairs and International Trade - House of Commons - Government of Canada in Ottawa, Canada.
November 1-2, 2002: A North American Community: A Modest Proposal To the Trilateral Commission, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
October 21, 2003: Dr. Robert A. Pastor- Vice president of International Affairs - Professor and Director of the Center for North American Studies - American University - Washington, D.C.: Testimony Invited by the U.S. House of Representatives - International Relations Committee - Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs.
March 2005: Creating a North American Community : [CFR] Chairmen's Statement -- Independent Task Force on the future of North America.
March 14, 2005: The Paramount Challenge for North America: Closing the Development Gap.
March 14, 2005: A Proposal for a North American Investment Fund: Adapting Europe's Model and Avoiding Its Mistakes.
May 27, 2005: Building a North American Community: Report of an Independent Task Force on the Future of North America -- Sponsored by the Council of Foreign Relations with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internationales by Dr. Robert A. Pastor.
May 27, 2005: Interview on: Building a North American Community: Report of an Independent Task Force on the Future of North America.
June 9, 2005: Testimony Invited by the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, A North American Community Approach to Security
Community vs. Union and Propaganda
How cleverly the promoters of the North American Union have used the word "community" when discussing the NAU. It is a very subtle form of PROPAGANDA. As proof of that accusation the following is offered:
Community (as defined by Webster's)
a) all the people living in a particular district, etc., b) the district, city, etc., where they live.
a group of people living together as a smaller social unit within a larger one, and having interests, work, etc., in common.
a group of nations loosely or closely associated because of common traditions or for political or economic advantage
society in general; the public
ownership or participation in common [community of goods]
similarity, likeness [community of tastes]
a) the condition of living with others b) friendly association; fellowship
Once the three countries have been combined into one, will our cultures blend into one? Will our local communities become one? Will our political interests become one? In all probability the answer to all those questions is, NO!
Where will one's allegiance lie? Will it be to N. America? Or . . . will it remain with Mexico, the USA or Canada? Will our language become one? If so which will it be, French, English or Spanish? Will our traditions become one? If so, which would that be, French, Spanish, or American?
What has already happened to our communities across America is the disintegration of our social fabric, our schools, jails, hospitals, and welfare system all created by the overwhelming numbers of illegal aliens and legal immigrants whose culture, allegiance and language differences have ALREADY balkanized our communities, dumbed down our schools, wrecked our social services systems, closed hospitals, and filled our jails. Do you think the future will get better when the doors are thrown wide open, with no restrictions, to all members of the North American continent?(17)(18)(19)(15)(16)
Will the North American 'Community' desired by our fascist government become a 'friendly association' of 'fellowship'? Will we all have the same 'community of tastes, similarity, likenesses'? Look around you. Is THAT what exists, even today? Of course not! Or will the contrived 'community' simply be a marriage of convenience created SOLELY for the economic advantage of the monied elites? Of course it will.
In fact, we will simply be a nation of 'people living in a particular district,' a 'smaller social unit' living within the larger area of North America having only a 'community of goods' and services in common. Surely one can agree that such a combining will NOT include common 'interests' except for those 'interests' of the 'money mafia' (i.e., capitalists, corporatists and bankers) and their fascist cohorts in the government. Won't we simply be 'closely associated only for THEIR 'economic' advantage, not ours, without any 'common traditions,' thereby creating a rudderless polyglot of disparate, balkanized peoples that just happen to populate the same piece of geography called North America? Does THAT a 'community 'make? Of course not!
So beware of the term 'community' used by the globalists to suck you into their propaganda using such benign, soft and agreeable terms to cover up their plans for a North American Union. The proof is that by DEFINITION we will NOT be a 'community.' Instead, we will simply and plainly become a 'union' as defined by Webster's as follows:
a uniting or being united; combination; especially: a) a combining, joining, or grouping together of nations, states, political groups, etc. for some specific purpose b) a marrying or being married; marriage
something united or unified, a whole made up of parts; esp., a) an organization or confederation uniting various individuals, political units, etc.
A Community is what you expect to happem AFTER the gradual progression of long periods of time, where people, events, polotics, laws, jobs, geography bears upon disparate peoples allowing them to coalesce and merge into a community. It CANNOT and does NOT happen instantly. Whereas the creation of a union DOES. Rip open the borders, send people flooding in of disparate cutlures, language, economic status, education levels, and you will get CHAOS but you WILL have a UNION!
Ergo, it will NOT be community. It WILL be a union WITHOUT the natural assimilation, acculturation and blending into the 'melting pot' the United States of America is famous for having achieved. It will not be a community. Instead it will be simply a polyglot of people, balkanized and angry towards each other until civil war erupts. This is on the horizon (re: Paris, Australia, etc.,) and has already come and gone in S. Africa. Will you sit back and wait for the demise of America, or will you fight to keep what took 400 years to build and mature into what once was Amercia the Beautiful?
Is Vicente Fox Really a Staunch Ally or Just a Puppet for Pastor and the CFR?
Most likely brought to power by the money from the US globalists - his election just like Calderon's, Mexico's recently elected president, was hotly contested in the streets by the Mexican people claiming voter fraud.
As soon as Fox arrived in office he lived up to the Robert Pastor's glowing accolades chronicled in his book when he described how he 'seized' upon Vicente Fox Quesada, who boldly proposed transforming the [NAFTA] free trade area into a common market like Europe's. Fox's first 'official' document was the "National Development Plan for 2001-2006 (i.e., Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2001-2006).
The 'National Development Plan' was described as follows: "Frankly, the official plan of Mexico is closer to a plan of colonization than it is to a plan of development. Just as their national plan clearly dictates, the Mexican government is preparing for an attack on America -- an attack perpetrated through ideology and assimilation rather than with bullets and blood."(97)
"The self-hating political correctness of mainstream Americans, combined with their history-blind confidence that the United States is a nation invulnerable to territorial loss, continues to aid and abet this aggression."(97)
"It is a fact of history that virtually every major act of aggression or subversion or strategic intent to be perpetrated has always been preceded by a documented policy statement in writing -- usually in the form of a book or some doctrinaire format that provides the guiding principles for its adherents and supporters. Such a document has always been necessary so that everyone understands the plan and the intended outcome. We have been warned. So far, everything is going according to the plan."(97)
As stated in Mexico's official National Plan of Development 2001-2006 . . . dual citizenship is officially encouraged by the Mexican government. According to W.J. Perry, the plan is a "shocking document . . . a five-year plan full of political rhetoric emphasizing planned improvements for every aspect of Mexico's infrastructure, but it also lays out specific strategies for expanding the nation's political reach far beyond the US-Mexico border . . . Mexico is systematically trying to cultivate dual loyalties, i.e. disloyalty, among its ethnic compatriots in America [think Aztlanders here]. This is a naked expansion of Mexico's national interest at the expense of ours; the mystery is why we are tolerating it."(98)
'Globalization' is a buzzword that appeares frequently in Mexico's 5 year plan. "The Mexican government is demanding that we give all Mexican illegals a free pass, and also support them with numerous social services paid for by American taxpayers. Some of these -- like free medical care -- we do not even provide to our own citizens. Mexico's plan specifically outlines its intent concerning Mexican citizens who have entered the United States illegally in a subsection titled 'Defense Of Mexicans Abroad.' The plan states:
It is important to note that even if Mexico has achieved a number of agreements and mechanisms to ensure better treatment of our countrymen abroad, the issue of migration, especially in the United States, needs a new focus over the long term to permit the movement and residence of Mexican nationals to be safe, comfortable, legal and orderly, and the attitude of police persecution of this phenomenon must be abandoned and it must be perceived as a labor and social phenomenon."(98)
Then in a televised interview in 2000, Fox made his country's intentions clear:
"I'm talking about a community of North America, an integrated agreement of Canada, the United States, and Mexico in the long term, 20, 30, 40 years from now. And this means that some of the steps we can take are, for instance, to agree that in five years we will make this convergence on economic variables. That may mean in 10 years we can open up that border when we have reduced the gap in salaries and income."(98)
Pastor and the Panama Canal . . .
Didn't you every wonder why Carter gave away the Panama Canal?
In his article titled: Meet Robert Pastor: Father of the North American Union, Jerome Corsi charges that: "Robert Pastor intends to give away U.S. sovereignty to a newly forming North American Union exactly as he gave away the Panama Canal to Panama during Jimmy Carter's presidency."(99)
There is absolutely no doubt about the clear and evident goal of the CFR as constantly expressed by their 'golden boy' Dr. Robert A. Pastor. He has been a consistent 'mouth piece' for their agenda for a minimum of eight years which includes the two years of study he made of the European Union before he wrote his 2001 'blueprint' for the NAU. He has been groomed, engaged, supported and showered with accolades from within and without the CFR's many tentacled operations, organizations and 'good ole boy' connections. Over the years he has had access and positions at the highest levels of our government.
Of import was the fact that from "February 1975 to January 1977, Dr. Pastor was executive director of the Linowitz Commission on U.S./Latin American Relations. The Linowitz Commission supported President Carter's decision to negotiate a treaty to turn over the Panama Canal to Panama. Pastor left the Linowitz Commission to join [and then] become director of the Office of Latin American and Caribbean Affairs in the National Security Council in the Carter White House. There Pastor served as Carter's 'point man' in getting the Senate to narrowly vote for the Carter-Torrijos Treaty on April 18, 1978, despite staunch objections from conservative politicians including Ronald Reagan."(99)
Did you know that it "was CFR stalwarts Henry Kissinger, Ellsworth Bunker and Sol Linowitz who arranged (with Senate approval) to give away the U.S. canal in Panama, and to pay the Marxist dictatorship in that country $400 million to take it?"(100)
But . . . Now We Know Why the Panama Canal Was Given Away . . . NASCO and NAIPN:
As you can see from the map above, there is no need for the Panama Canal when Communist China can pull up to three convenient ports of entry on the west coast of Mexico. Actually they can 'kill two birds with one stone' because Communist China will avoid the Panama Canal which takes a great deal of time to traverse and they will avoid the high cost of unloading at ports on the west coast of California.
Don't think for a minute that the Panama Canal will still be necessary to get to the east coast ports because the CFR membership is way ahead of you with their plans. They intend to carve up America into many Super Corridors to transport EVERYWHERE, including the east coast. The East coast will be the last to be conquered because it is more densely populated as opposed to Texas and the mid-west which has lots of open land and fewer people to resist having our country made into Communist China merchandise arteries.
Consider that the "Chinese have a world-class economy, the world's largest army, a fast growing navy and a nuclear arsenal aimed at U.S. cities. They are dead serious. Here's what one of their military leaders said: 'As for the United States, for a relatively long time it will be necessary that we quietly nurse our sense of vengeance . . . We must conceal our abilities and bide our time.' -- Lt. General Mi Zhenyu, Vice Commandant, Academy of Military Science, Bejing."(101)
In the frenzy to learn about and fight against the carving up of America and loss of our sovereignty, we must NEVER lose sight of the fact that the 'corridors' will literally provide 'avenues of transport' directly into the heart of America ready made for our conquering by foreign powers! You can stash a lot of armament and soldiers into thousands and thousands of shipping containers on trucks or rails, not to mention a dirty bomb or two. Do you think that Communist China would let us do that in their country? Think about all the socialist, and Marxist governments in South America that could make similar use of those Super Corridors. Wake up America . . . it is NOT just about roads!
The Hanjin Shanghai container ship is loaded up at Virginia Port Authority's
Norfolk Terminal, before leaving for Georgia on its way back to China.
Roey Yohai (THE WASHINGTON TIMES)(102)
Just What is NASCO and NAIPN . . .
It is another of the CFR elite cabals ingenious methodology for forcing America to surrender its sovereignty on the altar of global monopoly. NASCO stands for the North America's SuperCorridor Coalition, Inc., is a non-profit organization (Read no tax revenue for America's coffers while management and the banks will make plenty) dedicated to developing the world's first international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation system (Read here - A TOLL ROAD) along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America.
NASCO "Created the term 'International Trade Corridor' [ITC] now used internationally by all corridor coalitions." And NASCO has: "Provided a model for other successful trade corridor initiative through its work on I-35."(103)
For those of you who still believe the lies and propaganda that the NAFTA SuperHighway is nothing but a conspiracy theory, as stated by Dick Cheney and parroted by the media mafia, the mask is OFF! Take a few minutes to listen to this 'Manitoba Throne Speech' as a Canadian official nonchalantly talks about the NASCO (North American SuperCorridor Coalition) a/k/a the NAFTA SuperHighway and their planned destruction of our sovereignty. Bush, Harper and Cheney . . . liars all! Watch as they get caught in their lies, listen here.
History of NAFTA-NASCO SuperCorridor . . .
The following is a chronology that was quoted from the website of Nancy Boyda, who is currently campaigning for a seat in the U.S. Congress in the state of Kansas:
"1986-2006: Overall funding for the four-thousand-mile NAFTA-NASCO SuperCorridor -- running through the heart of America from Mexico to Canada -- has two financial components. The first component is a private, twenty-year fundraising campaign to build public support and lobbying clout through solicitation of 'memberships' from cities, counties, states, corporations, and individuals. The public component consists of NASCO being able to access federal taxpayer money by 'helping' to write the annual appropriations bills of Congress, with monies for NASCO projects buried deep within the 'Transportation' section of these bills.
1954: President Eisenhower establishes a long-term American-owned system of interstate highways.
1995: The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is signed without enforceable provisions for either labor safety or environmental health.
1996: The I-35 Corridor Coalition is formed as a non-governmental advocacy group for creating an 'international trade and multi-modal transportation corridor' reaching deep into the heartland of America. The name of the organization is then changed to 'North America's SuperCorridor Coalition, Inc.' (NASCO). (PR 8/4/05 NASCO)
1998: NASCO is instrumental in getting $700 million allocated and buried deep within the six-year 'Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century' (TEA-21). The Corridor provisions in 'TEA-21' were 'suggested' by NASCO itself for the purpose of the 'creation of the new corridor.' This NASCO-NAFTA SuperCorridor is to be privately owned, and designed for ease of penetration of all national borders (what NASCO calls 'border categories.') (PR 8/4/05 NASCO)
1998-2005: NASCO lobbies Congress for more money and further development of its plan for a separate but parallel corridor through the heart of America. The first segment is in Texas and is called the 'Trans-Texas Corridor-35' (TTC-35). Simply put, this is a privately-owned superhighway (NASCO-NAFTA SuperCorridor) running parallel to the publicly-owned Interstate 35, and intentionally created for private profit.
2005: NASCO is instrumental in inserting language for a 'Multi-State International Corridor Development Program' into the new federal highway bill. NASCO calls it the 'Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act -- A Legacy for Users' (SAFETEA-LU), and gets Congress to call it this. Through enactment of this $286 billion law, Congress quadruples funding for the next five years for the combined corridors and 'borders categories,' raising overall funding to $2.7 billion. NASCO gets $250 million of these 'earmarked funds' (virtually 10%) for further improvements in its connectors for the NASCO-NAFTA SuperCorridor. (PR 8/4/05 NASCO, entitled 'The Dust has Settled on the Transportation Re-Authorization Bill.')
2006: NASCO is aggressive in Texas by announcing the Cintra-Zachry deal, which consists of a wholly-owned US-Spanish consortium of private investors holding the exclusive rights to build, operate, and charge tolls on this private corridor now designated as 'Trans-Texas C-35.' This US-Spanish consortium is actually paying $7.2 billion dollars for the right to develop the first leg of the SuperCorridor, the 600 miles of it from the Mexican border to the Oklahoma border. While refusing to divulge all the terms of its 'proprietary contract' with the State of Texas, Cintra-Zachry will at a minimum get to operate this segment of the SuperCorridor on its own, and be able to charge tolls for years to come. Thus a foreign-owned private entity is in charge of a big hole in the Mexican border for its own private profits."(104)
What is a Multimodal Transportation System?
They will take I-35 (carved our of Eisenhower's FREE interstate route) probably using the Supreme Courts insane Kelo decision allowing private taking via eminent domain to create an integrated highway toll road: a 4-football field long swath which will include separate lanes for passenger vehicles (three in each direction) and trucks (two in each direction), six rail lines (separate lines in each direction for high-speed rail, commuter rail, and freight rail), and a 200-foot utility zone for oil and gas pipelines, alongside of electricity towers.
NASCO is a TRADE organization, not a government organization. NASCO officers are deeply involved in working with federal and state departments of transportation, local and state government, and regulatory agencies in promoting the Super Corridor.
The NASCO Corridor encompasses Interstate Highways 35, 29 and 94, and the significant east/west connectors to those highways in the United States, Canada and Mexico. The Corridor directly impacts the continental trade flow of North America. Membership includes public and private sector entities along the Corridor in Canada, the United States and Mexico.
Then There is CANAMEX . . .
The NAFTA corridor movement, involves CANAMEX another trade organization that promotes a Western tri-lateral route utilizing I-19, I-10, I-93 and I-15 in the states of Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Idaho and Montana to link the three countries in trade.
Another non-profit group, the North American Forum on Integration (NAFI), identifies four bands of NAFTA corridors (Pacific, West, East and Atlantic), all relying primarily upon internationalizing north-south existing interstate highways into NAFTA trade corridors.(106)
"Following the implementation of NAFTA, coalitions of interest have been formed in order to promote specific transport channels, to develop the infrastructures of these channels and to propose jurisdictional amendments to facilitate the crossing of borders. These coalitions include businesses, government agencies, civil organizations, metropolitan areas, rural communities and also individuals, wishing to strengthen the commercial hubs of their regions."(107)
"The North American trade corridors are bi- or tri-national channels for which various cross-border interests have grouped together in order to develop or consolidate the infrastructures. The North American corridors are considered multimodal in the sense that they bring into play different modes of transport in succession."(107)
"The infrastructures may include roads, highways, transit routes, airports, pipelines, railways and train stations, river canal systems and port facilities, telecommunications networks and teleports."(107)
As Goes Texas . . . So Goes the Nation?
Then there is the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is a NASCO member and NASCO supports the Trans-Texas Corridor as part of that relationship.
NASCO is particularly focused on coordinating the efforts of local, state and federal agencies and the private sector to integrate and secure a multimodal transportation system along the existing "NASCO Corridor."
Be prepared to have America divided into 4 Corridors. The Trans Texas Corridor (TCC-35) will start building in 2007. The corridor beginning at Mexico's west coast will let China et al offload their cargo on the Mexican trucks and be transported through Mexico and up the corridor I-35 that will split America in half all the way to Canada where it branches to the east and west coasts of Canada.
Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC-35) website has a 377 page 'report.' The sheer massiveness of it is overwhelming. The projects, the list of federal agencies, state agencies, U.S. Congressmen, Native American tribes, State officials, County Judges, City officials (mayors), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), Libraries, and other people and groups involved is astounding and is 30 pages long. The Executive Summery for the project is 56 pages long.(108)
Toll Road Giant Buys Newspapers to Silence Critics . . .
Critics charge that the Macquarie [an Australian Bank] purchase of American Consolidated Media is designed to silence critics of a Texas toll road project.
Australian toll road giant Macquarie agreed Wednesday [1/24/07] to purchase forty local newspapers, primarily in Texas and Oklahoma, for $80 million. Macquarie Bank is Australia's largest capital raising firm and has invested billions in purchasing roads in the US, Canada and UK.
Most recently the company joined with Cintra Concesiones of Spain in a controversial 75-year lease of the 157-mile Indiana Toll Road.
Going to... Kansas City ... Kansas City Smart Port Here I Come ...
Did you know that there are plans to have a Mexican Customs facility as part of the Kansas City 'SmartPort' in the area called the Kansas City Foreign Trade Zone?
How is it the mayor and others were able to create and put in place the many component parts of the SmartPort without your knowing or comprehending the vastness of it? A mega-project that could possibly impact your environment, societal or economic security, not to mention the threat to your national sovereignty or any other negatives that might factor in.
The fact is that got where they are today because they were operating covertly, under the radar with minimal and mostly VERY POSITIVE information provided by the complicit media. Their plan, of course, was to produce little or no resistance to their newly devised North American Union concept called an INLAND PORT.
Inland ports are a part of the federal government's overall plan which they euphemistically call the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or SPP for short. You will find that this massive project in your backyard is but one of hundreds of projects that the federal government's executive branch is spearheading through the Department of Commerce. They are working feverishly to move forward in many areas in order to create a fait acompli before you know what is actually going on.
IN FACT the Kansas City SmartPort is a major SPP component that will help them leverage the creation of the North American Union or the NAU for short. In order to achieve the North American Union projects like the Kansas City SmartPort was a results of the planning and agreements by the three heads of state from Mexico, Canada and the United States.
How did they do it? The Kansas City planners along with the complicity of your local, state and national news media maintaining their silence, was able to design, prepare and initiate the SmartPort concept. How they conducted their enormous planning, design, innumerable meetings, signed agreements, mobilization and project development and moved forward with little or no resistance.
The Kansas City SmartPort is a non-profit economic development organization formed to promote and enhance the Kansas City metro area’s status as America’s Inland Port Solution, "which will lease the customs site, has agreed to repay the city’s loan over 10 years with revenues generated by international trucking shippers, who will use the Mexican customs clearinghouse. SmartPort President Chris Gutierrez said he hoped the facility would be ready by March for an expected ribbon-cutting by Mexican President Vicente Fox."(109) Now it will have to be Calderon because Fox leaves office in December of this year.
"In October of 2005 nearly 200 U.S., Canadian and Mexican business and government leaders met Thursday to map new North American trade partnerships that will place Kansas City in a pivotal role."(109)
“Kansas City is well positioned to be an economic and transportation hub of North America,” said Sen. Kit Bond of Missouri, keynote speaker for the two-day conference. He outlined the region’s central geography, nationally ranked highway and rail assets, and a pending agreement that will allow Mexico to establish its first foreign-based customs inspection office here."(109)
"That precedent-setting international pact is the subject of high-level talks now between the two nations, and Bond said the deal was expected to close soon. The Kansas City Council has approved a $2.5 million loan to KC SmartPort to build the customs facility in the West Bottoms near Kemper Arena on city-owned land east of Liberty Street and mostly south of Interstate 670."(109)
Mayor Kay Barnes welcomed Kansas City’s international guests as “three cultures coming to the table as one for an economically stronger North America.”(109)
In the past year, the city has signed cooperative agreements with the Mexican deep-water port cities of Manzanillo and Lazaro Cardenas, and the Mexican state of Michoacan, aimed at fostering business and government partnerships to move goods to and from Mexico through Kansas City.(109)
The city today is scheduled to sign similar agreements with Winnipeg and the Canadian province of Manitoba . . . [Senator] Bond praised the effort as the first bringing together of the hemisphere’s key transportation, business and government leaders in working sessions. Transportation partnerships are a key component, and central to that is the Mexican customs presence in Kansas City.(109)
Freight would be inspected by Mexican authorities and then sealed in containers for movement directly to Mexican destinations, with fewer border delays. The deals become more lucrative when Asian markets that ship through Mexican ports are figured into the mix. Officials say the arrangement would shave significant time and labor costs for U.S. and Canadian exporters.(109)
“Do the math,” Kansas City-based international cargo broker David Burdick said at a work session Thursday. “People are saying this can’t be done. Well, it’s already being done. We’re way past proving our point,” said Burdick, president of Priority Logistics Inc. Burdick said the advantages of using Mexican ports over strained U.S. ports such as Los Angeles and Long Beach, Calif., are staggering.(109)
“Labor costs alone are 64 percent cheaper in Mexico,” he said. “As soon as Kansas City is clicking, everybody will want to use it. That is the hope of KC SmartPort, which promotes international trade in the region."(109)
But . . . How Many JOBS Does That SmartPort Produce?
Didn't you ever wonder what 'international trade' IS?
This is how the propagandists promote it: "Today, international trade is emerging as an important inter-jurisdictional issue in the Midwest region. The 1998 Mid-Continent TradeWay Study reinforced this reality. This study found that a significant amount of international cargo is already processed in or passes through the Kansas City region. In addition, NAFTA trade in Kansas and Missouri is growing, and opportunities exist to provide value-added services for NAFTA goods process more freight in the Greater Kansas City Area. The study also showed that the area needed a single organization with a sole focus of growing the transportation industry; enter Kansas City SmartPort."(111)
However, most Americans understand that international trade means NAFTA . . . American jobs going to Mexico and now with CAFTA they will also go to Central America. Here in the United states, those trucks and trains bringing Communist Chinese goods up the length of Mexico into the United States then all the way to the Kansas City SmartPort will be driven by, guess who . . . Mexicans. Guess who will get hired to do their maintenance?
The 'trade goods' will be warehoused in huge buildings that cheap Mexican labor will construct because they have already taken over the construction trades across America. As noted above . . . Mexican labor is 64% CHEAPER. Once the warehouses are built, all the movement of goods, storage, loading imports and re-loading them as exports will be done primarily by automation.
So the question is just how many jobs will Americans get, not to mention that you will now have to pay to drive on I-35 and other interstates.
How To Save Kansas City From Becoming the First of MANY Inland Ports:
Because the Kansas City SmartPort is the LYNCHPIN to all other proposed 'inland ports' . . . YOU the people of Missouri need to stop this treasonous attack upon America's sovereignty and that is a major Constitutional violation by all levels of government. Pursue the Mayor, the Senator, and others . . . in the courts, as follows:
By signing agreements with a Foreign Power, ALL agreement that have been signed to created the SmartPort and other similar roads are ALL in violation of the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 10, which says that no state shall enter into any agreement with a foreign Power without the Consent of Congress. By doing so they are in violation of our Constitution. That alone could stop the SmartPort. The Constitution TRUMPS all other laws.
NASCO Key Successes & Outcomes
NASCO states that they have: "Created the term 'International Trade Corridor' now used internationally by all corridor coalitions. Provided a model for other successful trade corridor initiatives through its work on I-35."(103)
"Memoranda of Understanding (MOU):
Created MOU with eight U.S. states and a Canadian province for continued cooperation toward technology development and infrastructure enhancement of the I-35/I-29/I-94 Corridor
Created MOU with U.S. Treasury Department to develop ITPC's along I-35
Created MOU with the U.S. Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Postal Service and the Texas General Land Office to promote alternative fuels along the corridor
Known as the strongest International Trade Corridor Coalition on Capitol Hill
Lobbying efforts have helped secure more than $150 million in corridor transportation project funding to date
Helped gain more than $79 million in Corridor projects in FY03 through the National Corridor Planning and Development Program, ITS Program, Interstate Maintenance Program and the Discretionary Bridge Program
Contributed to the state match of federal funds received for a 2002 transportation technology study -$15,000- innovative financing from NASCO
Successfully lobbied for the creation of two new categories under the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century -- the National Corridor Planning and Development Program and the Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program
Formation of a Corridor Caucus on Capitol Hill to promote corridor development and begin to organize as a corridor in preparation of the next re-write of the highway legislation next year
Successfully lobbied to take the Highway Trust fund "off-budget" which resulted in increased transportation formula funding for NASCO's corridor states
Awarded a seat on the North American International Trade Corridor DOT Steering Committee to oversee the development of the federally funded ITS/CVO study along the corridor"(103)
Since 1999, the Federal Government has directed more than $234 million in project funding towards the NASCO Corridor. Are you sick yet?
Congress Covering The SPP's Treasonous Tracks . . .
Katherine Harris (CFR) (who declared Bush the winner of Florida in 2000) with Co-Sponsors, Pearce and Shays, has proffered HR 2672 (May 26, 2005) the "North American Cooperative Security Act" " in the House "To direct the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a program to enhance the mutual security and safety of the United States, Canada, and Mexico, and for other purposes"(112) Well there's a loophole you can drive a tractor-trailer though, no pun intended.
And in the Senate: S. 853 Richard Lugar R-IN April 20, 2005 is EXACTLY the SAME name and purposes as the Harris bill. Co-Sponsors: Norm Coleman (R-MN); John Cornyn (R-TX); Charles Hagel (CFR) (R-NE); Kay Hutchison (R-TX); John McCain (CFR) (R-AZ); Ted Stevens (R-AK).(113)
As of this date, S. 853 has never emerged from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and H.R. 2672 has not emerged from the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment.
Therefore . . . there is NO congressional legislation for the authorization of the SPP working groups and task forces nor is there any proper oversight or control by the legislature of what the Commerce Department calls "a project."
The World Net Daily (WND) acting as a watchdog "has requested from [Geri] Word in the U.S. Department of Commerce a complete listing of the contact persons and the participating membership for the working groups listed in the June 2005 SPP report to the trilateral leaders. In addition, WND asked to see all work products, such as memorandums of understanding, letters of intent, and trilateral agreements that are referenced in the report."(82)
"Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American Union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form."(82)
Concerning Cornyn and the NADBank (North American Development Bank)
In order to cover what was already in progress John Cornyn (R-Texas) proffered a bill S. 3622 titled: "North American Investment Fund Act" . . . that would provide for what already existed . . . the North American Development Bank. Go here then click on "BECC-NADB CHARTER" to get the "Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Mexican States Concerning the Establishment of a Border Environment Cooperation Commission and a North American Development Bank" then click on "Summary of Project Financing Activities".
See where the NADbank authorizes USD $29.5 million in loans for air quality and solid waste projects in Baja California was announced in a press release here:(114)
Once the deceptive 'back door' bill by Cornyn was exposed, he backed down from it but will NOT pull the bill claiming it will just 'languish' till the end of the congressional sessions and then die. If he was REALLY sincere he would retract it now. Perhaps he is only waiting for the 'dust to settle' before it again sees the light of day. Two excellent articles on the issue were written by Joseph Farah and Jerome Corsi. You can find them here:(115)(116)
Wait till you see how US taxpayers are footing the bill for these projects and how they are manipulating all the MULTITUDE of governmental agencies to get essentially FREE money for their projects, from which the BANK makes a profit. Who's REALLY behind all of this . . . the One World Order, CFR cabal including the Money Mafia and many, many globalist traitors in our own governments, local, state and national.
Of course there is LOTS more on the site. It's huge. Educate yourself.
Be sure to Find Out More About This NAU STEALTH Project Here:(117)
Note: Border XXI in Roman Numerals is 21 and matches UN's Agenda 21!
Conceptually, the idea behind the North American Union is the same as for the European Union. Strategically, the idea is to create large regional, unelected, unseen governance structures that can be managed by the social engineers of the United Nations creating a totalitarian One World Government by stealth [Both the North American Union and the European Union began with a 'trade' agreement].
To understand how this treason has occured right under our noses, one must go back to the Stockholm 1972 Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. This conference was headed up by Maurice Strong, a socialist from Canada.
A U.S.-Mexico Binational Commission was established in 1981. Presumably, they are the ones who crafted the La Paz Agreement that was signed by Ronald Reagan in 1983. It implemented the principles defined in the 1972 Declaration.
The agreement called for the establishment of a precisely defined border region ostensibly for the purpose of working cooperatively with Mexico to clean up the environment in the region. It called for the establishment of six working groups to cooperate in the areas of (1) water, (2), air, (3) hazardous and solid waste, (4) pollution prevention, (5) contingency planning and emergency response, and (6) cooperative enforcement and compliance.
It's important to understand that Number 6 is the harmonization of laws between the U.S. and Mexico. This was pre-planning for the disintegration of the border and the establishment of the North American Union.
Several other clauses in the La Paz Agreement were written to allow both funding and expansion of the areas of responsibility without the oversight of Congress.
In effect, this agreement internationalized significant areas in the United States putting them under a different legal structure with the right under an international agreement to expand into the territorial United States.(117)
YOU . . . The Individual American Must Stand Up and Be Counted . . .
America is the only country in the world that can thwart the global fascists' drive to conquer mankind and achieve their goal of world dominion by a select few. To understand how they have operated in the past and will most likely in the future, take the time to watch this fifty-three minute documentary. It covers the poverty created by the predatory practice of loaning money to poverty stricken countries who can NEVER pay back the crushing interest that comes with those loans.(119)
The money is doled out to countries where as much as a third of those monies ended up in the pockets of the corrupt regimes that run the country. As part of the plan . . . many of those regimes were brought to power by the backing from first world countries. They now are suppressed by the IMF, the World Bank, the WTO and other organizations whose evil lust for wealth and political dominance necessitates keeping them enslaved and indebted in order to leverage their One World Disorder.(119)
Specifically covered is Indonesia which possesses enormous mineral wealth which has been co-opted by agreements between the lenders of the money and the corrupt regimes they have put in place. Indonesia is the perfect example to illustrate how the One World Order cabal functions because it is a country of vast mineral resources, a precursor to economic prosperity. Instead, Indonesia has devolved ever deeper into abject poverty because of the crushing debt and interest.(118)
What's in store for America?
A woman in South Africa warns those who remain cowed by the challenges ahead due to the overwhelming illegal alien invasion and the coming North American Union (NAU), both of which will force the elimination of our borders and sovereignty in complete defiance of 'We the People' our Constitution, Bill of Rights, and laws.
The woman, Gemma Meyer, sends the following warning to Americans:
South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveal trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country [of Rhodesia].
America's structures are Western. Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates. But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your western character.
Writing letters to the press, manning stands at country fairs, hosting fund-raising dinners, attending rallies, setting up conferences, writing to your Congressman - that is what you know, and that is what you are comfortable with. Those are the political methods you've created for yourselves to keep your country on track and to ensure political accountability.
But woe to you if - or more likely, when - the rules change. Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America. Unable to cope with the new rules of the game - violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusation of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial number, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power form the haves - Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in. They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life.
Once you lose social, cultural and political dominance, there is no getting it back again.
Unfortunately, your habits and values work against you. You cannot fight terror and street mobs with letters to your Congressmen. You cannot fight accusations of racism with prayer meets. You cannot appeal to the goodness of your fellow man when the fellow man despises you for your weaknesses . . . To survive, Americans must never lose the power they now enjoy to people from alien cultures. Above all, don't put yourselves to the test of fighting only when your backs are against the wall. You will probably fail.
Millions around the world want your good life. But make no mistake: They care not for the high-minded ideals of Jefferson, [Madison] and Washington and your Constitution. What they want are your possessions, your power, your status.
And they already know that there are allies among you, the 'human rights activists' the skillful lawyers and the left wing politicians will fight for them and not for you. They will exploit your Christian charity, and your good will.
They have studied you, Mr. and Mrs. America, and they know your weaknesses well.
They know what to do . . . Do you?(119)
As indicated throughout this article, there is strong evidence that America is in very serious trouble. If you still think not . . . re-read what FDR has engraved on his monument as seen above:
THEY (WHO) SEEK TO ESTABLISH
SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT BASED ON
THE REGIMENTATION OF ALL HUMAN
BEINGS BY A HANDFUL OF INDIVIDUAL
RULERS CALL THIS A NEW [WORLD] ORDER
IT IS NOT NEW AND IT IS NOT ORDER
We "live in interesting times. Our mainstream leaders have sold us out. Society has slipped the moorings of truth and is steered by megalomaniacs. All we can do is continue to man the lifeboats of truth."(120)
Wikipedia, United Nations, Accessed August 26, 2006, wikipedia.org, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations.
Miguel A. Faria Jr., M.D., Cuba and the Council on Foreign Relations, February 15, 2001, NewsMax.com, http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/2/15/224945.shtml.
Richard N. Gardner, The Hard Road to World Order, April 1974, Foreign Affairs, vol. 52, No. 3, (.pdf document for sale), http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19740401faessay10106/Richard-n-gardner/the-hard-road-to-world-order.html.
William F. Jasper, A NAFTA/FTAA Rogues' Gallery, April 5, 2006, stoptheftaa.org, http://www.stoptheftaa.org/artman/publish/printer_125.shtml.
David Rockefeller, David Rockefeller: Memoirs, Published by Random House, October 15, 2002 . The following quote is found on pg. 405.
Barry M. Goldwater, With No Apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater, 1979, Published by Morrow.
William Blase, The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the New World Order, 1995, conspiracyarchive.com, http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Council_Foreign_Relations.htm.
Doug Thompson, Bush on the Constitution: "Just a goddamned piece of paper", December 9, 2005, capitolhillblue.com, http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml.
Lincoln P. Bloomifeld, A World Effectively Controlled By The United Nations, March 10, 1962, getusout.com, http://www.getusout.org/artman/publish/article_2.shtml.
F. William Engdahl, Monsanto Buys 'Terminator' Seeds Company, August 27, 2006, Global Research, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=ENG20060827&articleId=3082.
Associated Press, VA nurse's letter to newspaper prompts sedition probe, February 8, 2006, firstamendmentscenter.org, http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=16438.
ImmigrationWatchdog, The Nation of Aztlan, March 28, 2006, immigrationwatchdog.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIW-BZ8oLrk.
Immigration Watch Dog: http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/ for The Aztec Al-Qaeda.
Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D., Security and Prosperity Partnership Background, August 7, 2006, NewsWithViews.com, http://www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis73.htm.
Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., LULAC Raises 'Hate Speech' to New Levels, January 17, 2006, Stop The North American Union, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/LULAC.html.
Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Pro-Illegal Alien Shills True To Their Hispanic 'Roots.' December 1, 2005, Stop The North American Union , http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Roots.html.
Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Insanity Reigns: Gov't 'Aids and Abets' Illegal Aliens (Part 1 - Overview), November 14, 2005, Stop The North American Union, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/InsanityReigns.html.
Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Misc. Madness: Gov't 'Aids and Abets' Illegal Aliens (Part 2), December 28, 2005, Stop The North American Union, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Misc.Madness.html.
Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Language Lunacies ~ Gov't 'Aids and Abets' Illegal Aliens (Part 3), February 21, 2006, Stop The North American Union, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/LanguageLunacies.html.
Laura Parker, FEMA critic's shirt gets him tangled up in ticket, March 3, 2006, infowars.com, http://www.infowars.com/articles/new_orleans/fema_critic_shirt_gets_ticket.htm.
Ronald Blocker, Memo to The School Board of Orange County , Florida , and Copy of Jan Hall's Letter, http://www.local6.com/download/2005/0825/4896076.pdf.
local6.com, Orange County School Board Rejects Hall's Resignation, September 14, 2005, local6.com, http://www.local6.com/print/4970614/detail.html.
Diane Grassi, Foreign Control of U.S. Interstates Encouraged by Feds, June 28, 2006, sierratimes.com, http://www.sierratimes.com/06/06/28/24_253_65_215_86332.htm.
US Dept. of Treasury, Exon-Florio Provision, Updated February 28, 2006, treasury.gov, http://www.treasury.gov/offices/international-affairs/exon-florio/.
James K. Jackson, The Exon-Florio National Security Test for Foreign Investment, (Full Version) Updated May 17, 2006, http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs//data/2006/upl-meta-crs-8980/RL33312_2006May17.pdf?PHPSESSID=9f6cef99bbfd7f159a7d739ebca3a38b.
Ted Bridis, Bush Unaware of Ports Deal Before Approval: White House Says Bush Wasn't Aware of Deal to Sell Port Operations to Arab Firm Before Approval, February 22, 2006, ABC News. http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1649248.
Jon Christian Ryter, Port Deal: Overture in Deceit (Part 1 and 2), March 1, 2006, News With Views, http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon124.htm.
R. Cort Kirkwood, Sink the Dubai Ports Deal!, March 20, 2006, Updated April 5, 2006, The New American, http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/printer_3462.shtml.
U.S. Dept. of Treasury, CFIUS and the Protection of the National Security in the Dubai Ports World Bid for Port Operations, February 24, 2006, treas.gov, http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js4071.htm.
U.S. Dept of Treasury, CFIUS Welcomes Dubai Ports World's Announcement to Submit to New Review, February 26, 2006, treas.gov, http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js4072.htm.
Dept. of Homeland Security, Fact Sheet: Securing U.S. Ports, February 22, 2006, dhs.gov, http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/press_release_0865.shtm.
Douglas Holtz-Eakin, You Can't Be CFIUS, July 13, 2006, Wall Street Journal, http://www.cfr.org/publication/11105/you_cant_be_cfius.html?creadcrumb=default.
James K. Jackson, The Exon-Florio National Security Test for Foreign Investment, (Short Version) Updated February 23, 2006, cfr.org, http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Exon_Florio.pdf. and Alternative Source: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RS22197.pdf.
Chuck Baldwin , UAE To Take Control Of Nine US Military Facilities, March 10, 2006, chuckbaldwinlive.com, http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2006/cbarchive_20060310.html.
Jennifer Loven (AP), Dubai gets green light for operations at some U.S. manufacturing plants, January 28, 2006, North Country Times, http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/04/29/news/nation/11_48_154_28_06.txt.
Joyce Morrison, American Water Works is for Sale - Again, April 18, 2006, newswithviews.com, http://www.newswithviews.com/Morrison/joyce30.htm.
Associated Press, Foreign companies buying U.S. roads, bridges, July 15, 2006, USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-07-15-u.s.-highways_x.htm?csp=34.
Kenneth Orski, The 'Tipping Point' Scenario Revisited, August 17, 2006, freedom.org, http://www.freedom.org/news/200608/17/orski.phtml?p=1.
Mish Shedlock, Selling Off Our Economic Future: The Inescapable Consequence of America's Payments Deficit, Accessed July 31, 2006, garynorth.com, http://www.garynorth.com/public/1426.cfm.
WorldNetDaily, Mexican truckers to hit U.S. roadways next year, September 1, 2006, worldnetdaily.com, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51779.
Charles Bowden, Holding the Line, August 2006, The Teamster, http://www.teamster.org/resources/members/TeamsterMagazine/06August/nafta.htm.
Jerome Corsi, Mexican trucks to enter U.S. freely?, June 27, 2006, WorldNetDaily, http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50803.
CBS News, Suit To Slam Brakes On Mexican Trucks, December 3, 2002, cbsnews.com, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/03/national/main531506.shtml.
Phyllis Spivey, Trade, Trucks, Trains, and Tolls, September 13, 2005, newswithviews, http://www.newswithviews.com/Spivey/phyllis8.htm.
Associated Press, Roads and bridges leased to or owned by foreign companies, followed by a list of proposed projects, July 15, 2006, Associated Press, http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/07/15/highways_glance/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+News.
Chuck Baldwin, America's Leaders Selling Our Country Out From Under Us, March 17, 2006, newswithviews.com, http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin287.htm.
Sara A. Carter, Breaking the silence: Convicted border agent tells his story, August 8, 2006, DailyBulletin.com, http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_4141562.
World Net Daily, 2 Border Patrol agents face 20 years in prison: Officers prosecuted -- wounded drug trafficker given full immunity in exchange for testimony, August 7, 2006, WorldNetDaily.com, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51417.
U.S. Senate, S. 2611: An Act -- To provide for comprehensive immigration reform and for other purposes, May 25, 2006, 109th Congress 2nd Session, http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=1019|6712|11536|19568.
William Buchanan and Robert Shoemaker, Selling out your country for a Pence, June 12, 2006, americanpatrol.com, http://www.americanpatrol.com/AMNESTY/2006/PENCE/BadNewsPence060612.htm.
Fredo Arias-King, Immigration and Usurpation: Elites, Power, and the People's Will, July 2006, Center for Immigration Studies, http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back706.html.
Deanna Spingola, The One World Order: The Military Minions, August 17, 2006, NewsWithViews.com, http://www.newswithviews.com/Spingola/deanna48.htm.
Allen L. Roland, Rex 84: FEMA's Blueprint for Martial Law in America, August 20, 2006, globalresearch.ca, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=ROL20060820&articleId=3010.
CBS News, 'Three Amigos' Pledge Cooperation, March 24, 2005 , cbsnews.com, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/23/politics/main682570.shtml.
White House, President Meets with President Fox and Prime Minister Martin, March 28, 2005 , whitehouse.gov, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050323-5.html.
State Department, North American Leaders Unveil Security and Prosperity Partnership: Bush, Fox, Martin outline trilateral efforts during March 23 meeting, March 23, 2005 , http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive/2005/Mar/23-209281.html.
Miguel Pickard, Trinational Elites Map North American Future in "NAFTA Plus." August 24, 2005, americas.irc-online, http://americas.irc-online.org/am/386.
The White House, News and Policies, March 28, 2005, whitehouse.gov, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/images/20050323-5_wf1g2276jpg-515h.html.
White House Press Release: The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: Next Steps, March 31, 2006 , http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060331-1.html. Note: The spp.gov version is a reprint of the above press release: http://www.spp.gov/pdf/security_and_prosperity_partnership_of_north_america_fact_sheet.pdf.
A. S. Herlong, Jr. (FL), Communist Goals for American Takeover, January 10, 1963, nationmakers.com, http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm.
Henry Lamb, Super-Corridor to oblivion, July 29, 2006, WorldNetDaily, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51282.
President's Council on Sustainable Development, We Believe Statement, 1993, Clinton4.nara.gov, http://clinton4.nara.gov/PCSD/Publications/TF_Reports/amer-believe.vtb.
White House Press Release, President Bush, President Fox of Mexico, and Prime Minister Harper of Canada in Press Availability: In Focus: Global Diplomacy, March 31, 2006, whitehouse.gov, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060331-4.html.
Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America: Prosperity Working Groups, Accessed August 24, 2006, spp.gov, http://www.spp.gov/prosperity_working/index.asp?dName=prosperity_working.
Jerome R. Corsi, North American Union Already Starting to Replace USA, May 30, 2006, humaneventsonline.com, http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15233.
Dept. of Commerce, Commerce Organization, Accessed August 31, 2006, commerce.gov, http://www.commerce.gov/organization.html.
Dept. of Commerce, Secretary Carlos Gutierrez Biography, Accessed August 31, 2006, commerce.gov, http://www.commerce.gov/bios/Gutierrez_bio.htm.
Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: Report to Leaders, June 2005, spp.gov, http://www.spp.gov/report_to_leaders/index.asp?dName=report_to_leaders.
Scott Miller, North America Borders' Security, Prosperity Links discussed, January 20, 2006, nato.usmission.gov, http://nato.usmission.gov/Article.asp?ID=512B1156-FE42-4ECE-9C1D-11FEA15DD0E6.
Automotive Partnership Council of North Amrerica (APCNA), North American Automotive Industry Statement on the Creation of the Automotive Partnership Council of North America, March 30, 2006, spp.gov, http://www.spp.gov/pdf/spp_atpcpressrelease_33006.pdf.
Reuters, Ford to invest up to $9.2 bln in Mexico : report, June 14, 2006, abc NEWS, http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=2075661.
Council on Foreign Relations, Building a North American Community: Report of an Independent Task Force, (pg. 34 or pg. 56 .pdf), May 2005, cfr.org, http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf.
YouTube.com, Council on Foreign Relations: Traitors, Erasing US Borders, April 8, 2006, youtube.com, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ensmPJm5B5A. Alternative sources: Lou Dobbs Video of the CFR Pastor speaking before the Congress about the elimination of our borders by 20l0 here: http://www.americanpatrol.com/05-FEATURES/050610-CFR-END-OF-US/050610_Feature.html and here: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/CFR_8102.htm.
Jerome R. Corsi, President Quietly Creating 'NAFTA Plus', May 24, 2006, Human Events Online, http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15059.
YouTube, Dick Cheney & David Rockefeller & FTAA Meeting, Accessed August 4, 2006, youtube.com, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MB5WgBtTbuI&mode=related&search=.
SPP, Fact Sheet: Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America, March 31, 2006, spp.gov, http://www.spp.gov/factsheet.asp.
Government of Canada , United States , Canada , and Mexico Launch North American Competitiveness Council, June 15, 2006, news.gc.ca, http://news.gc.ca/cfmx/view/en/index.jsp?articleid=220409.
Jason Lee Miller, House Turn Deaf Ear to Net Neutrality, June 9, 2006, webpronews.com, http://www.webpronews.com/2006/0609.html.
Danny O'Brian, The World's Worst Internet Laws Snaking Through the Senate, August 3, 2006, eff.org, http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004864.php.
Jason Lee Miller, Follow The New Neutrality Money Trail, June 8, 2006, webpronews.com, http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/marketinginsider/wpn-50-20060608FollowTheNetNeutralityMoneyTrail.html.
Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Why we should think twice about 'net neutrality', March 16, 2006, cfr.org, http://www.cfr.org/publication/10168/why_we_should_think_twice_about _net_neutrality.html.
Jerome Corsi, Bush sneaking North American super-state without oversight?, June 13, 2006, WorldNetDaily, http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50618.
White House Press Release, The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: Progress, March 31, 2006, whitehouse.gov, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060331.html. Note: The spp.gov version is a reprint of the above press release: http://www.spp.gov/pdf/security_and_prosperity_partnership_of_North_America_Fact_Sheet.pdf.
Les Kinsolving, 'No EU in U.S. ', July 12, 2006, WorldNetDaily, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51029.
Herbert G. Grubel, The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union, April 30, 1999, Fraser Institute, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32724.pdf. or. . . http://oldfraser.lexi.net/publications/critical_issues/1999/amero/amero.pdf.
Bernard Patry, M.P., Chair, Partners in North America: Advancing Canada's Relations with the United States and Mexico - Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and international Trade, December 2002, House of Commons - Canada, http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/Content/HOC/committee/372/fait/reports/rp1032319/faitrp03/faitrp03-e.pdf.
Benjamin J. Cohen, North American Monetary Union: A United States Perspective, June 2004, Global & International Studies Program, Dept. of Political Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=gis.
Robert A. Pastor, Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New, August 2001, Publisher: Institute for International Economics, as reviewed at American University: Center for North American Studies: http://www.american.edu/ia/cnas/pastortnac.html.
Robert A. Pastor, A North American Community: A Modest Proposal To the Trilateral Commission -- Troronto, Ontario, Canada, November 1-2, 2002, american.edu, http://www.american.edu/internationalaffairs/cnas/PastorTrilateral.pdf.
Joachim Bamrud, Beyond NAFTA, Accesses July 16, 2006, latinbusinesschronicle.com, http://www.latinbusinesschronicle.com/app/article.aspx?id=247.
Robert A. Pastor, A Blueprint for a North American Community, A News Release on August 30, 2001, iie.com, http://www.iie.com/publications/newsreleases/newsrelease.cfm?id=68.
Center for Democracy and Election Management, Dr. Robert A. Pastor, Vice President of International Affairs, Accessed July 17, 2006, american.edu, http://www.american.edu/ia/cdem/staff/rpastor.html.
Robert A. Pastor, Vice President of International Affairs, American University, Curriculum Vitae, October 2005, amderican.edu, http://www.american.edu/ia/pdfs/pastorcv.pdf.
American University, Curriculum Vitae of Robert A. Pastor, September 2006, american.edu, http://www.american.edu/ia/pdfs/pastorcv.pdf.
School of International Service at American University , Faculty Biographies -- Robert Pastor, Accessed August 30, 2006, american.edu, http://www.american.edu/sis/faculty/facultybiographies/pastor.htm.
Robert A. Pastor, North America's Second Decade, January/February 2004, 'Foreign Affairs' published by the CFR, http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20040101faessay83112/robert-a-pastor/north-america-s-second-decade.html.
W. J. Perry, The Mexican Government's Official Plan for the Takeover of America, December 12, 2002, property rightsresearch.org, http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/mexican_government.htm.
W. J. Perry, The Mexican Government's Official Plan for a Takeover of America, December 12, 2002, frontpagemag.com, http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=4987.
Jerome R. Corsi, Meet Robert Pastor: Father of the North American Union, July 25, 2006, Human Events, http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16189.
Steve Bonta, The Power Elite & George W., July 17, 2000, Vol. 16, No. 15 in The New American, http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2000/07-17-2000/vo16no15_bush.htm.
G. Russell Evans, Reflections on Defending America's Honor at the Panama Canal, November 11, 1999, newsmax.com, http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1999/11/1/131341.
Nich Carey, Containers pile up as imports from China soar, June 15, 2006, The Washington Times, http://washingtontimes.com/business/20060615-122003-3483r.htm.
NASCO, NASCO Key Success & Outcomes, Accessed August, 17, 2006, nascocorridor.com, http://www.nascocorridor.com/pages/about/about.htm.
Nancy Boyda, Chronology of NASCO's Role in the NAFTA SuperCorridor, Accessed September 4, 2006, Nancy Boyda For Congress, http://www.nancyforcongress.com/Preleases.php.
Infowars.com, CANAMEX Trade Corridor, Accessed July 2, 2006, infowars.com, http://www.infowars.com/images2/nwo/canamex.jpg.
FINA-NAFI, The North American Forum on Intergration (NAFI): Who Are We?, Accessed September 4, 2006, fina-nafi.org, http://www.fina-nafi.org/eng/fina/presentation.asp?langue=eng&menu=fina.
FINA-NAFI, The north americain (sic) trade corridors, Accessed September 4, 2006, fina-nafi.org, http://www.fina-nafi.org/eng/integ/corridors.asp?langue=eng&menu=integ.
TxDOT, Draft Environmental Impact statement - Tier One, Accessed July 8, 2006, keeptexasmoving.com, http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/pdfs/deis_05/document/ttc-35_deis.pdf.
Rick Alm, Trade deals put KC on the map; International leaders meet, October 14, 2005, The Kansas City Star, April 20, 2005, http://www.kcsmartport.com/sec_news/media/articles/kcstar_101405.htm.
Kansas City SmartPort, SmartPort, America's Inland Port Solution, Accessed September 4, 2006, kcsmartport.com, http://www.kcsmartport.com/index.htm.
Kansas City SmartPort: About SmartPort: Origins of SmartPort & The Kansas City Advantage, Accessed September 4, 2006, http://www.kcsmartport.com/sec_about/about.htm.
House of Representatives, H. R. 2672: North American Cooperative Security Act, May 26, 2005, govtrack.us, http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-2672.
U.S. Senate, S. 853: North American Cooperative Security Act, April 20, 2005, govtrack.us, http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-853.
NADBank.org, North American Development Bank authorizes US $29.5 million in loans for air quality and solid waste projects in Baja California, June 23, 2006 , nadbank.org, http://www.nadbank.org/Reports/Press_Releases/english/2006/062306.htm.
Joseph Farah, Cornyn wants U.S. taxpayers to fund Mexican development: 'North American Investment Fund' billed as answer to illegal alien influx, July 13, 2006, WorldNetDaily, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51036.
Jerome Corsi, Senator ditches bill tied to 'superstate': Makes decision after WND points out link to 'North American Union', July 25, 2006, WorldNetDaily, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51222.
Ejection2006.com, North American Union Treason, Accessed October 9, 2006, ejection2006.com, http://www.ejection2006.com/NAU/north_american_union.htm.
Documentary on Indonesia (53 minutes long) titled: The New Rulers of the World: New World Order http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/videos/IMF_Indonesia.html#start. Actual source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7932485454526581006&q=Indonesia+%2B+IMF.
Gemma Meyer, The Coming Darkness: A Warning for Americans: A message from South Africa, March 20, 2004, rhodesian.server101, http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/GemmaMeyer.html.
Henry Makow, Ph.D., Bill Gates: Satanist In Sheep's Clothes?: Theosophy And The 'New Age', July 9, 2006, rense.com, http://www.rense.com/general72/GATES.HTM.
Copyright © Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., 2009, All Rights Reserved
A Political blog with some news of the day , other subjects are welcome.